Answer:
An exact number is one that has no uncertainty. An example is the number of tires on a car (exactly 4) or the number of days in a week (exactly 7). An approximate number is one that does have uncertainty. ... The number can be the result of a measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
If 
is the cumulative distribution function for 
, then
Then the probability density function for is 
:
The 
th moment of is
![E[Y^n]=\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^\infty y^nf_Y(y)\,\mathrm dy=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^\infty y^{n-1}e^{-\frac12(\ln y)^2}\,\mathrm dy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BY%5En%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cint_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D%5E%5Cinfty%20y%5Enf_Y%28y%29%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy%3D%5Cfrac1%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%5Cpi%7D%7D%5Cint_0%5E%5Cinfty%20y%5E%7Bn-1%7De%5E%7B-%5Cfrac12%28%5Cln%20y%29%5E2%7D%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20dy)
Let 
, so that 
and 
:
![E[Y^n]=\displaystyle\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{nu}e^{-\frac12u^2}\,\mathrm du=\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{nu-\frac12u^2}\,\mathrm du](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BY%5En%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cfrac1%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%5Cpi%7D%7D%5Cint_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D%5E%5Cinfty%20e%5E%7Bnu%7De%5E%7B-%5Cfrac12u%5E2%7D%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20du%3D%5Cfrac1%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%5Cpi%7D%7D%5Cint_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D%5E%5Cinfty%20e%5E%7Bnu-%5Cfrac12u%5E2%7D%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20du)
Complete the square in the exponent:
![E[Y^n]=\displaystyle\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{\frac12(n^2-(u-n)^2)}\,\mathrm du=\frac{e^{\frac12n^2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-\frac12(u-n)^2}\,\mathrm du](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BY%5En%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cfrac1%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%5Cpi%7D%7D%5Cint_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D%5E%5Cinfty%20e%5E%7B%5Cfrac12%28n%5E2-%28u-n%29%5E2%29%7D%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20du%3D%5Cfrac%7Be%5E%7B%5Cfrac12n%5E2%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%5Cpi%7D%7D%5Cint_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D%5E%5Cinfty%20e%5E%7B-%5Cfrac12%28u-n%29%5E2%7D%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20du)
But 
is exactly the PDF of a normal distribution with mean and variance 1; in other words, the 0th moment of a random variable 
:
![E[U^0]=\displaystyle\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-\frac12(u-n)^2}\,\mathrm du=1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BU%5E0%5D%3D%5Cdisplaystyle%5Cfrac1%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%5Cpi%7D%7D%5Cint_%7B-%5Cinfty%7D%5E%5Cinfty%20e%5E%7B-%5Cfrac12%28u-n%29%5E2%7D%5C%2C%5Cmathrm%20du%3D1)
so we end up with
![E[Y^n]=e^{\frac12n^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BY%5En%5D%3De%5E%7B%5Cfrac12n%5E2%7D)
Answer:
both the first one
Step-by-step explanation:
use unit rate
7 . 112
8 . 246
for number 7 , you multiply 8 by 16 to get 128 then subtract both windows so you get 112
for number 8 , you find the area of the rectangle which is 10x26 = 260 then add the triangles area which is 130 and you get 390 then subtract the 16 window and 128 door
Answer:
H0: p = 0.078
Ha: p ≠ 0.078
Step-by-step explanation:
The researchers say that the rate is about 7.8%, or 0.078 as a decimal. That makes that the null hypothesis because using "is" in math is the same as saying "equals" and the null hypothesis always has the statement of equality in it. The reason there is a not equals to sign in the alternate is for this reason as well. The researchers say it is about that amount, not more or less than that amount. So it makes this a 2 tailed test. If the amount is significantly higher or lower, then we might have to reject the null hypothesis depending on the outcome of the test.
