Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
A monopoly firm is neither productively nor allocative efficient. The reason behind this is that it does not utilize the resources efficiently and produces below the socially optimal level of output.
Unlike perfect competition, which produces at the point where price equals marginal cost, a monopolist produces at the point where the price is greater than marginal cost.
This inefficiency is visible through the decrease in consumer surplus and deadweight loss. The difference between socially optimal level of output and monopoly output also represents inefficiency. The value of the goods and services that could have been made if monopolist chose to produce at a socially optimal level also shows inefficiency.
Answer:
D, value-based marketing
Explanation:
Value-based marketing -
The process of selling goods or services , when marketing is done to the customer's ethics and value , in order to orient the customer to buy a specific goods or services .
It shifts the marketing towards customer-centric from product-centric .
Hence , from the question , Trey is selling products by Value-based marketing .
Answer:
The demand for cereal is elastic.
The demand for the magazine is inelastic.
Explanation:
The price elasticity of demand is the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to change in price. A negative price elasticity implies that the product is a normal good.
The price elasticity of demand for cereal is −1.03. This means that the demand is price elastic. An elastic demand implies that a change in price will cause more than proportionate change in quantity demanded.
The price elasticity of demand for a particular magazine is −0.72. This means that the demand is price inelastic. An inelastic demand implies that a change in price will cause less than proportionate change in the quantity demanded.
Answer:
c. 1.6 percent.
Explanation:
GDP Deflator = Nominal GDP / Real GDP * 100
year 1
Real GDP = $2250 billion/72*100
= $ 3125.
year 2
Real GDP = $2508 billion/79*100
= $3175
Real GDP rose by = Real GDP (2nd year) - Real GDP (1st year)
= $3175 - $3125
= $ 50
% increase = $50/$2,250*100
= 1.6%
Therefore, The Real GDP rose by 1.6%.