1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ratling [72]
3 years ago
11

ASAP! GIVING BRAINLIEST! Please read the question THEN answer CORRECTLY! NO guessing. I say no guessing because people usually g

uess on my questions.

English
2 answers:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I and II are rewritten correctly. The last sentence puts a period in the middle, making it incoherent. The first two sentences use commas effectively and make the sentence flow well.

Explanation:

lisabon 2012 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. l and ll only

Explanation:

l. Just by reading this statement, you can determine that this is now a sentence, and not a sentence fragment. This is because the sentence makes sense, and as a result, is able to stand by itself without having another sentence elaborate onto it.

ll. This fixed statement is now a sentence as well, and not a sentence fragment. This is because following what had been said above, this sentence is almost exactly like the first, however, it has a word "later," switched around. This means it is also a sentence.

lll. Reading these two statements, you can tell that this is a sentence fragment. This is because the sentence has been split unnecessarily, and doesn't make sense. If you were to take one of the fragments away, the other wouldn't make sense.

<u>This means that we can determine that answer choice "A. l and ll only," are correct.</u>

You might be interested in
Why do you think he refers to Auschwitz as a place of "darkness and malediction"?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:many people have lost their lives there

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Grammar future: going to
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

will be going to that is the answer

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a response of two to three sentences, explain how these lines contribute to Grendel's characterization as a monster.
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

below

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A(n) _____ is a narrator who knows everything about the characters and relates these facts throughout the story.
rusak2 [61]
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be OMNISCIENT. An omniscient is a narrator who knows everything about the characters and relates these facts throughout the story. This is the point of view wherein the narrator knows everything including the events. Hope this answer helps.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why Amanda takes a second job. Be specific.
kifflom [539]

Answer:

<em>She probably is not well off enough financially, so she takes a second job to support herself.</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What punctuation is used after an independent clause to introduce a list?
    13·1 answer
  • The sum of two numbers is 77. The greater number is 5 more than the smaller number. Which equation can be used to solve for the
    12·2 answers
  • Which literary device does the writer employ in these lines? The old priest Peter Gilligan Was weary night and day; For half his
    9·1 answer
  • How did hela cells allow scientists to view “spontaneous transformation “?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did she leave me and take the kids?
    13·2 answers
  • What is included in the story "The Child of Urbino" but not included in the biography of Raphael?
    13·2 answers
  • Can sm1 give me two factual claim sentences ?
    12·1 answer
  • OKAY SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME JUST A QUICK QUESTION I WILL GIVE BRAINLY SO I HAVE TO TALK TO MY TEACHER CAN U JUST GIVE ME A QUICK
    10·1 answer
  • Underline the simple subject in each sentence. Then underline the correct
    14·1 answer
  • What are different ways we can help people feel excepted in a group?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!