Question 1: A. Meet American Indians in South Carolina.
Question 2: A. To convert the American Indians to the Catholic religion.
The Cofitachequi were the first contacted indigenous people that Hernando de Soto came into contact with in his expedition of 1540 into South Carolina. They were later visited by Juan Pardo in 1566-68 and by Henry Woodward in 1670.
One of the main motivations of these expeditions, especially those organized by the Spanish government, was to find new people to convert to Catholicism. Therefore, Catholic priests were among some of the first settlers in America.
While King Solomon reigned there was peace, but when he died the peace had stopped. The kingdom then split to the north half Israel and the south half Judah. The Northern part, Israel, eventually turned to polytheism and was destroyed by assyria, while the Southern part continued to believe in one God, and their faith was renewed by the prophets.
I trust many individuals are more intrigued to pseudoscience because of either religious or their inner beliefs (or a blend of both). A few people figure out how to influence that route, instead of the logical thinking and analysis if the pseudoscientific data runs forward with their confidence or thoughts. At times it goes to denying and ignoring the logical information, so dull as the pseudoscientific data runs forward with their standards, and the logical proof don't.Astrology is one thought that I am exclusively profound inside. I simply like the possibility of horoscopes and feel that my horoscope effectively discloses to me my character and considerably more. In view of the material this week it appears that astrology is a piece of pseudoscience as opposed to logical procedure frameworks. Another case would not meet right logical technique would be that confidence in pixies, sprites, and invented characters. I'm so wrong! I cherish the idea of creating these characters for my youngster and kids in my family. In spite of, the faith in these issues isn't deductively dependable. I've never viewed as about whether my conclusions in musings were deductively dependable or not.
Answer:
he is likely to learn abusive and agressive ways.
Explanation:
The way that Marxism different from the socialism advocated by Owens and Fourier was: <span>Marx described a system where the bourgeois capitalists were the tools of revolution.
According to marx, capitalistic society wouldn't be able to last forever because at some point, the people in lower economic bracket will revolt to the rich and create chaos in the society</span>
