A political viewpoint that favors native inhabitants over immigrants is the best description of a Nativist.
Option 1
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
A nativist by definition is a person or a public viewpoint that favors the provision of better privileges and rights to native residents and inhabitants of an area as opposed to immigrants who merely shifter to the area. A nativist is not a politician related to and favoring only Roman Catholics to office as it relates to all natives and not just Roman Catholics.
A Nativist isn’t necessarily cruel but every cruel leader isn’t a Nativist. A Native American activist is also a decent description but a native activist need not support natives exclusively, just because he is native, making option 1 the best answer.
True. He didn't disprove them but rather improve and broaden Kepler's original laws.
C because the federalist papers were all about supporting the bill of rights and backing the constitution
Answer:
yes it is possible for ethics to be passed down..
Explanation:
Ethics is concerned with rights, responsibilities, use of language, what it means to live an ethical life, and how people make moral decisions. ... Yet even though morals may vary from person to person, religion to religion, and culture to culture, many have been found to be universal, stemming from basic human emotions.
<em>Sorry:I learned how to speak your language,im not sure if you know english or not?</em>