1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
9

Ajax Computer Company is an accrual-method calendar-year taxpayer. Ajax has never advertised in the national media prior to this

year. In November of this year, however, Ajax paid $3 million for television advertising time during a "super" sporting event scheduled to take place in early February of next year. In addition, in November of this year the company paid $2,500,000 for a one-time advertising blitz during a professional golf tournament in April of next year. What amount of these payments, if any, can Ajax deduct this year
Business
1 answer:
SOVA2 [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: No deduction can be claimed this year.

Explanation:

The options to the question are:

a. No deduction can be claimed this year.

b. $5.50 million

c. $2,500,000

d. $5.50 million only if the professional golf tournament is played before April 15.

Answer:

Since Ajax Computer company is an accrual method calender-year tax payer, the computer company would recognize the expenses only when such expenses are incurred and not at the time that cash is being paid for the the expenses

Ajax computer company already paid in advance for both advertisements the following year even though the advertisement eanst taking place that year. Therefore, the payments will not be considered to be an expense until advertisements has actually taken place. Because of this, Ajax cannot deduct the amounts paid for the advertisements next year and hence, no deduction will be claimed this year.

You might be interested in
Who is sus? pink or blue im playing among us
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

pink smh

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose the M P C is 0.8 and the current tax rate is 25 % . What is the government purchases multiplier? Specify all answers to
Goryan [66]

Answer:

Therefore, Increases in the tax rate decrease the government purchases multiplier

Explanation:

Given that

MPC = 0.8

Tax rate t = 0.25

tax rate is increases by 35%

Government purchases multiplier

= 1 ÷ 1 - MPC × (1 - t). Here

So, GPM = 1 ÷ 1 - 0.8 × (1 - 0.25) = 2.5

Government purchases multiplier

= 1 ÷ 1 - MPC × (1 - t)

MPC = 0.8

tax rate t = 0.35

GPM = 1 ÷ 1 - 0.8 × (1 - 0.35)

= 2.08333

= 2.083

Therefore, Increases in the tax rate decrease the government purchases multiplier.

3 0
3 years ago
Please help me, I suck at this class ToT
damaskus [11]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Roger parked his car at a garage that has a large sign at the entrance saying, "This garage is not liable for items stolen from
denpristay [2]

Answer: True

Explanation:

An exculpatory clause is a form of contract provision which relieves one party of liability when damages are caused while executing the contract. The party which ssues the exculpatory clause is the one that is seeking to be relieved of any potential liability incurred.

There has already been a notice that "the garage is not responsible for any item stolen from the car". Roger parking his car at the garage is at his own risk as the garage owners won't be responsible.

6 0
3 years ago
At age 55, Ellen separated from service with her former employer. She rolled over $19,000, the entire balance of her 401(k), int
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

$2,150

Explanation:

When taking money out, it is a compulsory requirement to pay an early withdrawal or distribution penalty, before the age of 59½ years.

In the case of Ellen, she's not up to 59½ years old, she's still 55.

The age 55 exception is an exception that allows people not to pay 10% early distribution penalty for retirement plan distributions before they get to 59½ years old.

Taking IRA from an account (401(k), in this case) into another account (an IRA) by someone like Ellen who is not up to 59½ years old is not considered a distribution, so she is totally free to change financial institutions at any time without worrying about a penalty tax.

So, $2,150 of her early distribution is subjected to early distribution penalty but she won't be penalised

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Understanding the Nature of Communication
    8·1 answer
  • Which savings account can a financial institution end?​
    13·1 answer
  • Neptune Corporation owns 70 percent of Pluto Company's stock. On July 1, 20X4, Neptune sold a piece of equipment to Pluto for $5
    15·1 answer
  • Calculating Economic Value Added East Mullett Manufacturing earned operating income last year as shown in the following income s
    9·1 answer
  • Due to disagreement between senior interviewers at Calvtipy, a publishing firm, the human resources department gave each of the
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of mockery as a tool of discriminatory treatment in​ organizations?
    10·1 answer
  • Clock and Cane Company. has 6.8 percent, semiannual coupon bonds on the market with twelve years left to maturity, face value of
    8·1 answer
  • Which answer choice is not one of the top 10 abusive lending practices?
    13·2 answers
  • Gottschalk Company sponsors a defined benefit plan for its 100 employees. On January 1, 2020, the company's actuary provided the
    15·1 answer
  • Chelsea bought a bond with a face value of $5,000. The bond has a term of 4 years. Chelsea bought the bond at a 3 percent discou
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!