1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pishuonlain [190]
3 years ago
7

Who’s the prime misuse rod Canada

History
1 answer:
Natalija [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Justin Trudeau

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Jages and Supply and Demand
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

1. How do we decide how much each person in society should be paid?

The highest paying jobs in society typically have a combination of two factors: 1) they are highly specialized, that is to say, difficult to perform, 2) they have a high demand.

Two examples are: medical specialists, and CEOs.

Why do some jobs receive high wages while others do not? Do wages

reflect what types of jobs our society values?

Jobs that receive higher wages, again, are either more difficult to do, or have a higher demand, or are more scarce.

This does reflect in part what types of jobs our society values, however, not all high paying jobs are well valued, and some low paying jobs enjoy prestige.

2. Using what you know about supply and demand and labor, explain

how changes in supply and demand couple impact employment and jobs

In the current economic crisis, we have seen a reduction in the demand for jobs, because most firms are either selling less, or have simply gone out of business.

This has led to higher unemployment, since many people have been fired and cannot find new places where to be hired.

7 0
3 years ago
At the close of World War I, three countries were considered the "Big Three" for diplomatic purposes. Who were they?
Roman55 [17]
The "Big Three" countries were the United States, Great Britain and Russia. They were called this because they were by far the most important allied players during the war, with Russia and Britain taking on most of the casualties. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the confederacy go to war against the union
taurus [48]

South wanted slavery, rebellions because of Lincoln becoming president, John Brown's and other abolitionists actions, the consequences caused by Compromise of 1850, the consequences of the Fugitive Slave Act, and the controversy and Bleeding Kansas.

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose you walk into the Capitol in Washington and ask to interview the most prominent person in the entire Congress. If they a
Setler79 [48]
If they accept, you'll get an appointment with the "<span>A. Speaker of the House", since this person is in charge of the "floor" in the sense that they decide what is heard. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)
diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What conclusion does this Christian-themed crown from medieval Ethiopia support? A photograph features an Ethiopian crown decora
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the Spanish intervene in Hati?
    9·2 answers
  • Explain how the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918 is similar to the current pandemic ​
    15·1 answer
  • What was Francis Bacon known for?
    7·1 answer
  • What practice does the government allow farmers that is illegal in other industries?
    12·2 answers
  • ________________ were peaceful demonstrations where citizens would visit stores or offices and refuse to leave or give up their
    15·1 answer
  • Which word or phrase from the passage shows the purpose of the narrator's "violent gesticulations"?
    10·1 answer
  • The ceremonial ruler ________ of a inherits his or her position, but elected officials run the government.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the result of J.P. Morgan able to control his competition?
    7·1 answer
  • How do you think the Ukrainian-Russian Conflict will end?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!