Answer:
it convinced many europeans to value logic and reason over religion and tradition
Explanation:
apex
Answer: Disagree with the majority viewpoints
Explanation:
Julio is understood to disagree with the majority of the group due to her views always appear abstract and far different from the other members in the group. So when discussing policies, her opinions are taking with not much heavy consideration due to how she sees things.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
1) highlight in one color Europe and North America says that in the 2 par.
2) in the 3th par. highlight in a different color the one, Europe and North America and Latin America ( a region that includes South America, central America, and the Caribbean as defined by the united states)
3) in the fourth par. highlight 50 percent and 18 percent in different colors the 1 and 2
4) you can title it "Christianity Changes"
5) and can I see the next page I need to see that to do this problem and I will edit this and put the right answer
hope this helps
Answer: Islam
Explanation:
62% of Central Asia pratices Islam
