Absolute monarchy was good because it was more efficient than some other methods of rule. very organized and just following one ruler. it was bad because what ever the ruler say goes, nobody could have any say against it.
As Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki negotiates his exit from power, the one demand that the U.S., Iran and Iraq’s Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani can agree on is the need for the new leadership of Iraq to form an inclusive government of Shia, Sunni and Kurdish leaders.
After eight years as prime minister, Maliki is being forced out for the same fundamental reason that former Egyptian leader Mohammed Morsi is in jail: They both represented marginalized communities and rose to power in the wake of brutal dictatorships. Both failed for the same fundamental reason: They could not bring themselves to be inclusive.
<h3>hope it's help you</h3><h3> plz mark as brain list.....!!!!! </h3>
I believe the power was separated so that no one group of people had to much power. It is the basic gest of why we separate a lot of things so that everyone has equality and all power is not going to one person or group who does things in favor of another person or group. The power was then distributed so each branch could help keep the other branch from becoming power hungry and unsociable power feigns.
Some characteristics of agrarian societies were:
• rapid technological advances
• extra food during winter
• less leisure time
• freedom to work different jobs
• depletion of the soil
