Answer:
B. Attack and occupy Pensacola
Explanation:
Just did the assignment ;)
Answer:
The answer is option D "Pro-choice on the issue of abortion"
Explanation:
Progressivism, in the US, political and social-change development that carried significant changes to American legislative issues and government during the initial twenty years of the twentieth century.
Progressivism reformers put forth the main exhaustive attempt inside the American setting to address the issues that emerged with the development of an advanced metropolitan and modern culture. The U.S. populace almost multiplied somewhere in the range of 1870 and 1900.
Urbanization and movement expanded at quick rates and were joined by a move from nearby limited scope assembling and business to huge scope industrial facility creation and monster public companies. Innovative forward leaps and furious looks for new business sectors and wellsprings of capital caused remarkable financial development.
Answer:
During the Articles, the national government consisted of a unicameral (one-house) legislature, there was no national president or executive. Delegates to Congress were appointed by state legislatures, each state also only got 1 vote. Some other key points are: Congress could not draft an army, Congress did not have the power to tax citizens, and Laws needed approval by all thirteen states to be passed.
hope this helped :)
Explanation:
Answer:
speculation about Barack Obama tapping former rival Hillary Clinton to join his team as secretary of State is gaining serious momentum. Apparently Obama has already become bored with the presidency and wouldn’t mind shaking things up a bit by inviting the drama-prone Clintons back into the White House. Clinton would surely be a capable diplomat whom the world would embrace with open arms. But what else might be behind Obama’s thinking or Clinton’s, for that matter?
• Jonathan Freedland notes that “Obama partly passed over Hillary as V.P. because he didn’t want to import the Clinton family psychodrama into his White House,” but Hillary as secretary of State will invite the same “back-seat driver implications.” However, it’ll also “demonstrate great confidence on Obama’s part” that he won’t be “upstaged by a global celeb such as Hillary.” Of course, if he doesn’t pick Hillary, “he’d better have a pretty good explanation” or her supporters will be “mad at him all over again.” [Guardian UK]
