Considering the situation described in the question, the phrase that exemplified the situation is "disparate impact."
This is because the disparate impact is a phenomenon or situation that occurs when some policies or decisions are made in a neutral sense.
However, the effect of such policy appears to affect a certain set of people, thereby appearing as if it is discrimination.
In other words, a disparate impact is a form of unintentional discrimination that is originally established as impartial policies or regulations that are made generally but whose effects appear to affect a certain set of people.
In this case, the policy made by Sentinals FC on hiring new players affects a certain set of people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "disparate impact."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20510564
<span>This is a de-marketing strategy through ads, which are assumed to be digital ads. The assumption is that the digital ad would reach the target audience of teenagers to discourage smoking. This type of marketing campaign shows the tobacco company in a 'responsible' light to the consumer. By discouraging underage use, the consumer can assume that this must be a good company and is honest in their marketing.</span>
Households are the owners of the factors of productions, while firms determine what amounts of those factors to hire.
The correct answer would be answer choice <u>C. determining the qualities.</u>
When it comes to comparing things you will always use the qualities of the person, place, or thing.
Hope this helps.
~Lexa
Answer:
sandwiches
Explanation:
supplier has plenty of spare capacity to increase output
high stocks levels are available to meet raising demand
short production time frame to get products to market
easy of factor substitution is high