1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexxx [7]
4 years ago
15

Would you say that Hammurabi was a just king

History
1 answer:
AfilCa [17]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

He had the influence of his brother, the Sin-Muballit, in c., to be the Amorite King of the First Dynasty, in the Babylonian city State. 1792 before Christmas. There was a misunderstanding. So Hammurabi grew to his trone in an arduous diplomatic condition as the ruler of a small kingdom.

Explanation:

Answer is above

<em><u>Hope this helps.</u></em>

You might be interested in
Which brought an end to the great West African empires?
kozerog [31]

Answer:

The Kingdom of Songhay came to an end when the Moroccans invaded and conquered them. By 1600 CE, the days of the great kingdoms of West Africa were over.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is FEMA?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

a.

Explanation: none needed

4 0
4 years ago
Which of the following was an immediate cause of the Panic of 1837?
melisa1 [442]
One immediate cause of the Panic of 1837 was that federal government stopped accepting paper money for the purchase of land. 
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Kyoto Protocol was a(n):________.
vichka [17]

Answer:

d. agreement setting limits on emissions of greenhouse gases from industrial countries.

Explanation:

The Kyoto protocol is an international treaty which is concerned about the protection of the atmosphere. It ensures that there is a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and greenhouse gas emissions to reduce global warming.

The Kyoto protocol is an agreement setting limits on emissions of greenhouse gases from industrial countries which are involved in large manufacturing processes.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the controversy between imperialists such as Beveridge and anti-imperialists over the terms of th
levacccp [35]
The correct answer is
<span>They disagreed over the acquisition of the Philippines


The republicans didn't want the Philippines while the Democrats wanted to acquire it. Those against it believed that it would make the US into an imperialist force like those in Europe that they believed were evil, while the Democrats wanted more land and more resources, claiming that they would help the people of Philippines. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why would anger at their own governments cause young Muslims to attack America?
    12·1 answer
  • Isolationists and hostile critics in 1940–1941, and even after world war ii, charged franklin roosevelt with deliberately and so
    14·1 answer
  • Using what you’ve learned, describe the effect of communications technology on globalization. Be sure to mention how communicati
    15·2 answers
  • Did japan have the right to attack the u.s at petal harbor
    9·1 answer
  • How did Confucianism develop
    5·1 answer
  • Which scenario best illustrates the principle of popular sovereignty?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the French aid relations between the United States and China?
    13·1 answer
  • This allows voters to remove elected officials from office before their terms are up.
    13·1 answer
  • Who or what did early humans worship?
    11·2 answers
  • Question 3 of 5
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!