Answer:yes
Explanation:
Canada's role in the Afghanistan War began in late 2001. Canada sent its first element of soldiers secretly in October 2001 from Joint Task Force 2,[1] and the first contingents of regular Canadian troops arrived in Afghanistan in January–February 2002. Canada took on a larger role starting in 2006 after the Canadian troops were redeployed to Kandahar province. 2,500 Canadian Forces (CF) personnel were in Afghanistan and 1,200 made up the combat battle group.[2] At the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that an undisclosed number of Canadian soldiers would remain in the country to help train and mentor the Afghan National Army until 12 March 2014 (though Canadian troops ended their combat role there in 2011).
In September 2001 after the September 11 terrorist attacks, Minister of National Defence Art Eggleton advised Governor General Adrienne Clarkson to authorize more than 100 Canadian Forces members serving on military exchange programs in the United States and other countries to participate in U.S. operations in Afghanistan. Eggleton summed up the dominant thinking in the government at the time when he said, "Any Canadian military deployment to Afghanistan may well be similar to a situation in Eritrea and Ethiopia where we went in on the first wave, we helped establish the stabilization, the basis for ongoing peace support operations that would come after ... but then turned it over to somebody else."[3] The operations were aimed at identifying and neutralizing al-Qaeda members in that country, as well as toppling the Taliban regime, which was supporting international terrorism.
Starting with African-Americans; in America, they were first slaves, indentured servants, and even after the Civil War, after the Emancipation Proclamation, there was still a thing called "segregation" where they split up the African-Americans from the Caucasians, and this would happen with regular objects, such as water fountains and restrooms, and even schools. Then we have the buses, where African Americans had to sit in the back. Now, from this upcoming, you don't have much attention, or rights, so they had to fight for their right to vote, and they had to fight for a right to even exist as a regular human being. They finally gained the right to vote in 1965. And now for women, we had to fight because, back then, we were only seen as "property", we had to be supervised, we couldn't have actual jobs, back then you would be the typical house wife, cleaning, chores, teaching your daughter how to cook, and clean. And if we couldn't even come out of our houses unsupervised, what makes you think we can go out and vote? We couldn't vote because we didn't have a say/voice in anything. So that's where the women's rights movement came up, and we have to thank Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Stanton, and Lucy Stone. The 19th amendment was passed in 1920, and we had the right to vote.
The life style one is seen as leading
1980 was the time at the end (but people didn't know that) of the Cold War, that is the conflict between Capitalism and Communism,
US had a capitalist system and was actively involved in stopping the spread of Communism in Asia and Latin America and this is also the correct answer: stopping the spread of Communism.
Professor Gustafson is developing a new intelligence test and wants to ensure the test has good inter-rater reliability. The following strategies will most directly help him achieve this goal- (C) <u>By </u><u>Allowing only trained researchers to grade the test, as they will have a good understanding of the proper way to score certain things and will be more likely to agree</u>
Explanation:
In order to test the inter-rater reliability of the new intelligence test professor Gustafson should:
- Trained researchers to grade the test because they have the knowledge of the test
- A trained researcher will be able to score the test result in a proper way
From the given option (a) allowing only a small subset of highly trained researchers to grade the test, because this ensures standardization of test conditions is not a valid option because the test is still in the developing stage so, the standardization of the test condition will not serve the purpose
