Please read

1 answer:

8 0

To form a judgment as to why you support or dispute the statement that "Psychology is not a real science because it is composed primarily of opinions" requires further research into the field of study of psychology.

<h3>What is Psychology </h3>

The definition of psychology can be understood as a discipline that studies human behavior and mind, from sociological and physical aspects, such as nervous system functions and cognitive development.

Psychology does not follow the scientific methodology for determining human behavior, which due to its subjectivity may not be easily measured and clearly detected.

The statement therefore that psychology is not a science makes sense supported by author Ferguson, who suggests that this is due to internal and external problems such as the defensiveness of psychology and the lack of replication of studies that occur in other sciences.

Find out more information about psychology here:

brainly.com/question/3951300

You might be interested in

Can someone help?

Darya [45]

In the early 20th century the US was the largest agricultural producer

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are the no locks on the Suez Canal the answer is B. The elevation of the Red and Mediterranean Seas are about the same.

WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

<h2>I think that b is the correct answer the correct explanation to this is to not trust me because I am only a 20 percent sure!!</h2>

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

According to math teachers,what did the acorn say when it grew up worksheet e-40

Gre4nikov [31]

Answer: is it this sheet?

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

In discussing personal and social barriers to success, the author of the Diversity Consciousness textbook discusses the role of

Elanso [62]

Answer:limited perception

Explanation:The courage to define yourself.We must not allow other people's limited perceptions to define us. It is hard to believe just how much time I have wasted worrying about how other people have seen me, what they have thought of me, what they have considered me to be, the value they have seen in me. I somehow grew up putting a great deal of value in other people's perceptions of who I am and what I am worth, even when those people really have not known much about me at all. Because of this tendency, I have made many of my decisions in life based on what I have thought other people would think about me and my decisions actions. I have rejected possible relationships because of what I thought other people would think about me if I went out with a certain girl. I have not pursued certain careers because of the judgments that I was sure other people would pass on my choice of professions. I have not pursued certain passions because I did not want people to think less of me. I have also lost an amazing number of opportunities in my life. And while I am not going to spend today regretting what I did or did not do yesterday, I know that my life could be much more fulfilling today if I had not worried so much about what others thought earlier in my life. I wanted to be the person that I thought others wanted to see, so that they would accept me more fully. But that acceptance would have been conditional, which is the worst type of acceptance that we can possibly pursue.

8 0

3 years ago

Give an example of how the ability to construct good arguments could help you in your career or in your daily life

bekas [8.4K]

The concept of a good argument is of course quite vague, if an argument has only one or more false premises, then it is not a good argument. Unless the premises of an argument are all true, then it would have no reason to accept to accept its conclusion. In my line of my work In Home Health Care there is always a good argument to go on.

4 0

2 years ago