Answer:
7 loans were made to clients with Graduate education who also had 17 years of experience
Explanation:
We have to solve for which is the intersection between the two groups.
66 is the count for +17 years
83 is the count for Graduate
the two groups is 149 loans
Then, we have 142 loans which are not part of both groups. Therefore, the difference are the loan count which do belong to both groups:
149 total loans - 142 loans out = 7
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
ok and thanks for the points
thanks:)
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Aggregate demand will decrease by $900 billion.
The overall demand for finished goods and services in an economy at a certain period is known as aggregate demand (AD) or domestic final demand (DFD) in the field of macroeconomics. Effective demand is a common name for it, however other times this term is used to make a distinction. This is a country's demand for its gross domestic output. It details the volume of goods and services that will be bought at every price point. The aggregate demand is made up of investment, corporate and governmental expenditures, consumer spending, and net exports. Real output is represented on the horizontal axis and the price level is plotted on the vertical axis to represent the aggregate demand curve. Although it is presumed to be downward sloping, the Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu findings demonstrate that the curve's slope
To know more about aggregate demand refer to brainly.com/question/24777291
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
$69.33
Explanation:
The current stock price in DDM = D1/r-g
Where D1= Dividend at year 1 = Current dividend (1+ growth rate)
D1= $2 (1+ 4%)= $2.08
R = Required rate of return= .07
Current Stock price= $2.08/0.07 - 0.04
Current Stock price= $2.08/ 0.03
Current Stock price= $69.33