Answer:
Explanation:
Advantages
1. A monarchy is regarded as one of the most stable forms of government.
2. Monarchies reduce the levels of political divide in a country.
3. Most monarchies rule from a centrist approach.
4. It is possible to reduce or eliminate corruption within the boundaries of a monarchy.
5. There are opportunities to refresh the government.
6. Monarchy leaders are trained from birth to become leaders.
Disadvantages
1. Monarchies can require minors to serve as their country’s head of state.
2. It can be difficult to stop the powers of the monarchy.
3. There is no guarantee of competency coming from the leadership
4. A monarchy can decide to remove all checks and balances.
5. Monarchies create a class-based society.
I think some people didn't really care about it , it really depends on who you are.Some people like Monarchs because it helps society have order and others think that its horrible because Monarchs decide on what you can and can't do and they try to gain too much power/
The rule of law has been linked to a number of positive social outcomes, including higher rates of economic growth, less violence, reduced inequality, better health, and higher literacy.
More detail about this is provided below.
<h3>Just what are the benefits of a government based on the rule of law?</h3>
One of the many advantages of a society based on the Rule of law is that it helps to protect the judicial system's autonomy. Modern conceptions of the Rule of Law involve safeguarding the judicial system's impartiality.
This indicates that wherever the Rule of Law functions in the true and contemporary meaning of the term, there is an increase in the independence of the judicial system.
Stronger economic growth, more peace, less inequality, better health outcomes, and more educational opportunities have all been linked to the rule of law.
You may learn more about the concept of rule of law at this link: brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ1.
Your answer is India and China.
<u>Problems faced in India(water and air pollution)</u>
<em>A diverse range of pollution sources co-exists in urban environments. Conventional sources of air pollution include vehicular emissions, coal-based power plants, fossil fuel consumption in industries and some agricultural activities such as fertilizer application and farm fires. Air pollutants can be natural or may be the result of various anthropogenic activities. Examples include production of brick kilns that use raw wood, agricultural waste or poor quality coal used as a fuel, the roadside burning of organic and plastic waste, cooking that involves the burning of solid biomass or cow dung and the unintentional burning of municipal solid waste at landfills, and construction activities (Kumar et al, 2015) (Figure 3). The local emission inventories point to about 5300 and 7550 tons yr−1 of PM10 and PM2.5 release from waste burning in Delhi, respectively, while the corresponding emissions from construction are 3250 and 10,750 tons yr−1 (Guttikunda and Goel, 2013). Other such sources include diesel generators for temporary power generation in cities, traffic congestion, and </em>
<u>Problems faced in China(water and air pollution)</u>
For over a decade in China, China has been the world’s largest annual emitter of greenhouse gases. Regardless of some pro-ecological alternatives and investments in alternative energy sources, the country’s emissions keep growing, contrary to the worldwide trends.
That seems to be the most worrying part. The other main global polluters, for instance, the US, have been successfully pursuing the reduction of greenhouse gas and particulate matter emissions. That’s not the case with China, which continues to fulfill its growing demand for energy with fossil fuels.
Answer:
vatican city
Explanation:
it is the smallest, with less than 1,000 residents and an area of only 44 hectares
