Answer:
Correct answer is B. He legalized Christianity and changed the capital.
Explanation:
Option B is correct because he legalized Christianity with the Edict of Milan in 313 and also created new capital, named Constantinople after him.
A is not correct as he didn't split with Rome, he strengthen the Empire.
C is not correct as he changed the system and ruled as a sole ruler.
D is not correct as he was a part of the council of four, but decided the full authority in the country after defeating Licinius.
You could write your paragraph about the fact that Hammurabi’s code shows evidence of laws. Or the fact that this implies currency or some sort of trade. This also heavily implies a class system which I feel would be easy to write about.
Most time, the women in ancient Asia assert their independence by claiming that she is oldest living member of the family if the husband dies.
<h3>What was the common woman role in ancient Asia?</h3>
During the ancient Asia, majority of women worked in the home weaving silk and caring for the silkworms that produced it.
Despite that they played a main role in production, the gender was mostly restricted to conventional role and not accommodated in government authority and were seen as inferior to male.
Hence, the the women in ancient Asia assert their independence by claiming that she is oldest living member of the family if the husband dies.
Read more about ancient Asia
<em>brainly.com/question/27729209</em>
#SPJ1
During the Progressive Era (the early 20th century), the women's rights movement main focus was:
2. Winning the right to vote.
During this time arroused a fight against political and economical corruption and social problems. The wrestle to gain the right to vote, not only was a purpose in itself, but represented the struggle for equality. It was the first victory that helped women to continue to pursuit more rights.
Answer:
B No state may contradict federal law.
Explanation:
The suprememacy clause lays out how Federal law is always superior to state laws, if a state creates a law that contradicts federal laws it could go to the Supreme Court for a ruling, which in turn could nullify the law if it is found to violate the suprememacy clause.
