Those students used the central route to persuasion, and were influenced by the quality of the persuasive argument.
<h3>What is a persuasive argument?</h3>
This is the type of argument that the person arguing engages in because they want to get the other party to see their point of view.
The goal is to ensure that the person you are talking to buys your idea and works with it. The way people go about this argument is through the use of logic and reasoning.
The goal is to try to be able to get the other person to adopt your pattern of reasoning and also take action based on that.
This can be referred to as a call to action by appealing to the emotions and the reasoning of your audience.
Read more on persuasive argument here
brainly.com/question/1790640
#SPJ1
Answer: The divine right of kings.
Explanation:
Absolutism is the political position that describes the king as having the absolute power of a region or country, and there are no divisions of power superior to the king; that is to say <em>"the will of the king is absolute"</em>.
In these systems, the king has the power to make laws, exercise legal judgments, appoint members of his cabinet, or eliminate and create branches of government.
Currently, some examples of absolute monarchies are Saudi Arabia and Vatican City.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer and Explanation:
- Stefan-Boltzmann law. Stefan-Boltzmann law, expresses that the all out brilliant warmth power transmitted from a surface is corresponding to the fourth intensity of its total temperature.
- The law applies just to black bodies, hypothetical surfaces that assimilate all occurrence heat radiation.
- From the relationship which is an adjustment to Astronomy, of Stephen's Law:
![L = [RT^{2}]^{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=L%20%3D%20%5BRT%5E%7B2%7D%5D%5E%7B2%7D)
where
L = Luminosity
R = Radius
T = Temperature
"Bigger" alludes to the radius,
"Bluer" for the temperature scale and
"Brighter" to glow in the articulation.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
