2 years ago

Does 1 to 3 solve a portion

Mathematics

2 answers:

Rus_ich [418]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Please explain right

Step-by-step explanation:

Alecsey [184]2 years ago

7 0

Uhh what? I would be happy to help what do you mean tho? Be clear.

You might be interested in

Look at the model below which are true

OLga [1]

3(2+x)

open the parenthesis

= 6 + 3x

3(2+x) = 6 + 3x

Hence the statement of equality is true

H is the correct option

6 0

10 months ago

Solve the system

konstantin123 [22]

Use substitution.

y = 2 - x and y = 4x + 7 can become

2 - x = 4x + 7

Now solve for x

-5 = 5x

-1 = x

Now plug -1 for x in either equation.

y = 2 - x -> y = 2 - (-1) -> y = 3
y = 4x + 7 -> y = 4*-1 + 7 -> y = -4 + 7 -> y = 3

So C) is the correct answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Need 19 plz don’t rlly understand but if u can help that would be amazing thanks <3

Neko [114]

Answer:

I got zero but I am not sure if that is right

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

6w= 12+6w divided by 2

Alisiya [41]

W = 2. Don’t listen to the other guy!

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If b = 3, then 3x + y = 1 and bx - y = 3 are parallel.<br> True or <br> False ...?

Ulleksa [173]

I am absolutely sure that the task <span> b = 3, then 3x + y = 1 and bx - y = 3 is NOT parallel, which means that the statement represented above is FALSE.
To make sure you can check it using : </span> $y=-3x+1

y=3x-3$ Hope now it's obvious. Regards!

4 0

3 years ago