1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnoma [55]
2 years ago
13

One result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was? Select one: a. compensation of Japan

ese Americans for their wartime internment b. improved educational opportunities for African Americans c. the establishment of the U.S. Department of Labor d. the election of John F. Kennedy as U.S. president
History
1 answer:
stealth61 [152]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Improved educational opportunities for African Americans ( B )

Explanation:

The U.s supreme court Judgement in Brown vs Board of education of Topeka was a Landmark decision that sough-ted to end segregation and discrimination against African American students in the Education factor. although the Judgement did not have an immediate impact in America because some states refused to Obey / enforce the Judgement and most schools still remained segregated.

One major achievement was that as some schools remained segregated the educational opportunities for African Americans improved in terms of quality educational materials and better learning conditions.

You might be interested in
Before the Reformation, the dominant force in European life was the
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: Catholic Church.

Explanation:

For the first time in history, the Catholic Church's authority was seriously questioned by the Reformation. Reformers began to point out irregularities in the church, injustices such as the sale of inductions. Until that moment, no one had shaken the church's authority so seriously, those who would eventually try would end up either at stake or in exile, prosecuted by the Inquisition and the like.

4 0
2 years ago
I have to write a letter to Van Gogh
Nataly [62]

Answer:

i wont make a paragraph, cuz im not good at that.   but i will give you give you these.

Explanation:

1.vincent aan goh dcreated about 2100 pieces of artwork.

2.his mos famous peice of artwor was starry night

3.starry night costs about 1 billion dollars

quotes:

1.Love many things, for therein lies the true strength, and whosoever loves much performs much, and can accomplish much, and what is done in love is done well.

2.For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

3.If you truly love Nature, you will find beauty everywhere.

7 0
2 years ago
Suppose a country comes out of world war 2 with increased territory but much structural damage. It employs a commandshow has the
abruzzese [7]

Answer:  As with any well thought out and planned packaging scheme, the science of

military packaging for the United States Government developed from a well recognized logistical

need. This science has evolved over the course of its life to accommodate the many technology

changes in how the military distributes its supplies. It remains a dynamic force that can either

provide a positive or negative contribution to the success of military missions. Unlike most elements

of military doctrine, military packaging is rarely understood and appreciated for its contributions,

thus making it a prime target for criticisms from uninformed opinions.

The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware of the basic reasons behind why military

packaging exists. This paper will review the many historic factors that first led military leaders to

recognize the need to protect supplies and equipment, and then follow the evolution of the science of

military packaging through current day practices.

GENESIS: The need for specific military procedures and requirements on how to package materiel

first surfaced on two different fronts. The Army had run sustainment exercises to Iceland during the

summer of 1941, and experienced high levels of supply losses that troop units attributed to bad

packaging. The same problem hit the Navy quite dramatically during the amphibious operations at

Guadalcanal in 1942. The commercial packaging that the Army, Navy and Marine Corps used during

the early months of World War II colossally failed to serve its intended purpose, and seriously

jeopardized the War Department's and Navy Department's abilities to sustain operations then being

planned. No one in either of those Departments had paid attention to the changes that had occurred in

packaging designs since Armistice Day.

In 1918, the most common shipping containers for military supplies were wood boxes, crates,

kegs and barrels. These were very much like the common commercial shipping containers of that

era, and were well-suited for all types of supply distribution environments. These containers were

heavy-duty, sturdy designs, generally built by craftsmen. With proper care, some surviving examples

of these containers could be readily used today as intended.

Immediately prior to World War II, military planners failed to recognize that the packaging they

had been receiving with their supplies would not meet their vital needs for overseas operations.

Industry had recognized that they could lower costs and improve profit margins by getting their

products to market in suitable packaging that weighed less and cost less to produce than traditional

packaging. In 1914, American railroads, who at the time were carrying most of the freight in the

United States, recognized and authorized the use of corrugated and solid fiberboard shipping

containers for packing many different types of products. Motor carriers, in turn, followed the

railroads' example in 1935 when they adopted their own packaging rules that often called for

fiberboard boxes. The United States Treasury Department issued the first federal specifications for

corrugated and solid "fiber boxes" in 1930 for packing supplies used by the civil agencies.

Industry, at the time, was also moving toward marketing plans that products would be consumed

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The m the most fundamental weakness of the articles of confederation was a lack of
Nadusha1986 [10]
Lack of Power to raise funds for the militia. The significant defeat of the Articles of Confederation was just shortcoming. The government, under the Articles, was excessively feeble, making it impossible to authorize their laws and in this way had no power. The Continental Congress had acquired cash to battle the Revolutionary War and couldn't reimburse their obligations.
3 0
3 years ago
PLEASEEEEE HELPPPPP 30 POINTS <br> US western territories 1820-1860 internal improvements
saul85 [17]
<h3><u>US western territories 1820-1860 internal improvements</u></h3>
  • 1824 Heavy duties are levied on linen, cotton, iron and other finished goods.
  • 1828 The tariff of abominations contributed to the nullification crisis of 1832 the greatest degree of protectionism before the Civil War.
  • 1832-1860, trade tariffs were slowly lowered as opposition from the South and West intensified.
  • 1832-33, In reaction to the controversy about nullification, a settlement was found with South Carolina and tariffs were reduced.
  • 1842, The tariff introduced by Parliamentary Whigs brings the penalty up to 1832.
  • 1846, The Walker Tariff (Democratic) is levied primarily on revenue.
  • 1857,  Prices are further lowered and the free list is expanded.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the difference between Britain and France’s use of land
    13·1 answer
  • What was the U.S. response to North Korea's invasion of South Korea?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the result of galvezs military actions
    5·1 answer
  • 1. The ___ guaranteed that not even the king was above the law.
    10·2 answers
  • What was an effect of Queen Hatshepsut's policies?
    7·2 answers
  • How was the dakota reservation 1851-1863 important
    15·1 answer
  • Nehemiah was a cupbearer to the king.<br><br><br> True False
    13·1 answer
  • Choose the correct trail to answer each question.
    8·1 answer
  • Describe how the 1920s could be considered both “roaring” (progressive or liberal) and “nervous” (reactionary or conservative).
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me? :(
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!