1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mamaluj [8]
3 years ago
12

Heidee Corp. and Leaudy Corp. have identical assets, sales, interest rates paid on their debt, tax rates, and EBIT. However, Hei

dee uses more debt than Leaudy. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
A) Heidee would have the higher net income as shown on the income statement.
B) Without more information, we cannot tell if Heidee or Leaudy would have a higher or lower net income.
C) Heidee would have the lower equity multiplier for use in the Du Pont equation.
D) Heidee would have to pay more in income taxes.
E) Heidee would have the lower net income as shown on the income statement.
Business
1 answer:
kifflom [539]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

E) Heidee would have the lower net income as shown on the income statement.

Explanation:

Heidee and Leaudy have the same Earning Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT).

They both also have the same interest rate paid on debt.

So if Heidee uses more of their debt than Leaudy it means they will incur more interest payment on debt.

This will result in less income for the company.

On the other hand Leaudy uses less debt so their interest expense is low and income is higher.

Heidee would have the lower net income as shown on the income statement.

You might be interested in
Fallsview Glatt Kosher Caterers ran a business that provided travel packages, including food, entertainment, and lectures on rel
inessss [21]

Answer: The Contract is valid.

Explanation:

Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.

However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.

The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.

If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.

From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.

Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.

As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The preemptive right is important to shareholders because it a. protects bondholders, and thus enables the firm to issue debt wi
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

b. protects the current shareholders against a dilution of their ownership interests.

Explanation:

Shares are ownership interests that are owned by business owners and measures the degree to which an individual has a stake in a company.

Preemtive right occurs when a shareholder has a right to purchase a particular portion of newly issued shares.

For example if an individual has 40,000 shares and additional 250,000 shares are issued, he can have the right to purchase an additional 30,000 of the new shares.

The preemtive right prevents dilution of ownership interests by ensuring old stockholders have a stake in newly issued shares.

7 0
3 years ago
Cartels control the production and pricing of goods mainly through
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

the elimination of competition

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is a good Warzone loadout. Best gets Brainliest. Explain
muminat
M4A1 is the best weapon
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The arguments for restricting trade Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the United States’ imposing trade restrictions on
Ilya [14]

Answer:

Infant-industry argument

Explanation:

Infant-industry argument says that a particular industry can't compete with other international competitors because of the economies of scale. So, they demand a temporary protection until they gain economies of scale to be ready to compete on a level playing field.

Note: This can also come in the category of 'unfair competition' argument as huge economies of scales of well established companies create an unfair environment for nascent industries to compete on a same level.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hodge Inc. has some material that originally cost $74,600. The material has a scrap value of $57,400 as is, but if reworked at a
    6·1 answer
  • At Taylor Activewear, orders have significantly exceeded projections, and Macon, the operations director, has decided to hire fo
    14·1 answer
  • Predatory pricing is a type of price discrimination that​ ________. A. allows prices to be cut to the level of variable costs B.
    5·1 answer
  • In june 2009, when general motors went bankrupt, ______ became its majority stock holder.
    10·1 answer
  • Define osmosis and predict the direction of water movement based on differences in solute concentrations.
    8·1 answer
  • Good designs offer users as many alternatives as possible <br> a. True <br> b. False
    14·1 answer
  • Eliza took her car to her regular mechanic, who had a private business. The mechanic often advertised on billboards, writing "Re
    13·1 answer
  • Economists group commercial​ banks, savings and loan​ associations, credit​ unions, mutual​ funds, mutual savings​ banks, insura
    5·1 answer
  • To help increase investment spending, the government can: lower taxes on investment spending while raising taxes on savings so t
    9·2 answers
  • Ron and Amie invested $5,000 in an educational savings account for their daughter when she was born. They were unable to ever ad
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!