Answer:
The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.
Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.
Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.
Explanation:
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.
It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.
<u>The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, </u><u>instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma</u><u>. </u><em><u>This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans</u></em><u>.</u>
Thus the correct option is A.
The answer is: They knew the lay of the land, while the Americans had to search their way
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the statements. Without the statement, we do not what are the options to answer this question.
However, what we can do to help you is to answer this question based on our knowledge of the topic.
A statement that could describe the Second Red Scare and McCarthyism is "a time in US history when Senator McCarthy used of accusations, blacklisting, and investigations against suspected communists."
We are referring to Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who in those Cold War years accused that many members of the US federal government and the US military were supporting Communist activities in the mid-1950s. McCarthy just accused people but never offer a serious argument or proof, so he ended up being a liar and his political career ended.
Question: In the early 20th century, describe how life for black people was different in Vienna,Australia compared to life in the United States
Answer: The nineteenth century was a time of radical transformation in the political and legal status of African Americans. Blacks were freed from slavery and began to enjoy greater rights as citizens (though full recognition of their rights remained a long way off). Despite these dramatic developments, many economic and demographic characteristics of African Americans at the end of the nineteenth century were not that different from what they had been in the mid-1800s. Tables 1 and 2 present characteristics of black and white Americans in 1900, as recorded in the Census for that year. (The 1900 Census did not record information on years of schooling or on income, so these important variables are left out of these tables, though they will be examined below.) According to the Census, ninety percent of African Americans still lived in the Southern US in 1900 — roughly the same percentage as lived in the South in 1870.
