There are infinitely many ways to do this. One such way is to draw a very thin stretched out rectangle (say one that is very tall) and a square. Example: the rectangle is 100 by 2, while the square is 4 by 4.
Both the rectangle and the square have the same corresponding angle measures. All angles are 90 degrees.
However, the figures are not similar. You cannot scale the rectangle to have it line up with the square. The proportions of the sides do not lead to the same ratio
100/4 = 25
2/4 = 0.5
so 100/4 = 2/4 is not a true equation. This numerically proves the figures are not similar.
side note: if you are working with triangles, then all you need are two pairs of congruent corresponding angles. If you have more than three sides for the polygon, then you'll need to confirm the sides are in proportion along with the angles being congruent as well.
Hello there.
<span>How to solve -2 = -6 + 4v?</span>
<span><span>−2</span>=<span><span>4v</span>−6</span></span>
<span><span><span>4v</span>−6</span>=<span>−2</span></span>
<span><span><span><span>4v</span>−6</span>+6</span>=<span><span>−2</span>+6</span></span><span><span>4v</span>=4</span>
<span><span><span>4v/</span>4</span>=<span>4/4
</span></span><span>v=1</span>
Answer:
I have a feeling it won't be exactly 15 minutes but it'll be around that time, if it's true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2 Liters
Step-by-step explanation:
.25 liters=1/8 fish aquarium
.25x8=2
You don't need 3 equations to get a general solution. To do this use the equations x-3y-z=0 and -x+2y+0z= -3. Start out by letting z = t. Then solving those 2 equations simultaneously, your x's cancel out leaving you with -y-z=-3. But since z=t, then -y=-3+t or y=3-t. Now sub that in for y in the first equation, along with the fact that z=t to get x-3(3-t)-t = 0 and solve for x. x=9-2t. So a general solution for this would be (9-2t, 3-t, t)
