Hey there!
Your correct answer would be
. . . .
Justification
The reason why D.) would be your correct answer would be because, imagine a mother giving rules to her son. If the father were to say something that would violate the wife's decision then this would be highly rude of him
It's same in this case,<span>Local governments have the right, they to do it, they just can not violate them.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen</span>
I don't seem to understand what you are trying to say
Answer:
Roger decided to build the deck himself
Explanation:
This example illustrates the need to work based on the laws of comparative advantage. Roger needed a deck, he could have paid someone to build it for him, but somehow he identified the need to build his deck himself as he believed it was more costly to employ or pay someone to build the deck for him.
The law of comparative advantage explains the opportunity cost advantage a person/country has over other countries in producing a good or rendering a service. The entity with a comparative advantage can produce for less cost than the others.
Technoloy can be used to drill oil, as a result pollute water, and soil, green house gas, which can cause global warming, and if oil leaks into the ocean, as a result the marine sea animals can get sick and die.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Inductive Reasoning.
Explanation:
There are two types or methods of reasoning. One is Inductive Reasoning and the other is Deductive Reasoning. Inductive method of reasoning focuses on the reasoning that the premises are seen as supplying some evidence or proof for the occurrence of the conclusion. Inductive reasoning starts with an observation, moves towards the generalization and then a paradigm is formed.
Just like in the given example, the person notices that her in door plants grow at a better pace when they are exposed to music. This example is the most close resemblance with the Inductive Reasoning.
