The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
<span>An example can be “Kate is shocked to
hear that her best friend Mary, apparently a very honest individual, cheated on
a physics question".</span>
The term cognitive
dissonance in the study of psychology is used for the psychological disturbance
experienced by an individual who at the same time have two or more ideas,
concepts or values which are contradictory to each other.
He conquered all of the egypt
Shape profit orientations, agenda set, and amount of hard news offered.
Most of the time the important news is not given due prominence by preference on issues that can generate more profit, this causes the vision of society to change, and that we do not become more capitalist and thus observing in many moments only what generates the most. Profit is less what effect matters to society.
When the news of a celebrity buying new clothing is more important than the disasters that have happened in china, for example.
The social forces that reshaped the United States in its first half century were profound. Western expansion, growing racial conflict, unprecedented economic changes linked to the early Industrial Revolution, and the development of a stronger American Protestantism in the Second Great Awakening all overlapped with one another in ways that were both complementary and contradictory. Furthermore, these changes all had a direct impact on American political culture that attempted to make sense of how these varied impulses had transformed the country. The changing character of American politics can be divided into two time periods separated by the War of 1812. In the early republic that preceded the war, "REPUBLICANISM" had been the guiding political value. Although an unquestioned assault on the aristocratic ideal of the colonial era, republicanism also included a deep fear of the threat to public order posed by the decline of traditional values of hierarchy and inequality
