Which statement describes the main difference between the information provided in the video and in the passage

QUESTION 2

givi [52]

Answer:A

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

(writing a memo) – Respond to the following prompt, writing a memo that abides by all format and content guidelines. Apply at le

Mama L [17]

Answer:

Memorandum No. 0009

Sender: Debora Min Chief Pharmacist at Lebanese International University Health Center

Recipient: pharmacists and pharmacy technicians

Subject: changes in working hours.

Lebanese International University Health Center, March 13, 2020.

Pharmaceutical and technical ones.

I would like to inform you about changes in your work schedule. From May 23 to August 22, your working hours will be reduced from 8 am - 5 pm to 8 am - 3:30 pm. The reason for this change is the reduction in the number of collaborators, since fewer students are available during this period of time, due to the summer holidays. However, we know that it affects your salary, so I would like to invite you to participate in a meeting where we will discuss the best way to reward you. The meeting will take place on March 30, at 9 am, in the boardroom.

Before I would like to clarify that:

The reduction of the workload thinking about the well-being of our technicians and pharmacists.
The workload reduction was carried out to avoid overloading workers.
No worker will be harmed by the new guidelines

Debora Min

Chief Pharmacist at Lebanese International

Explanation:

A memo is a short, quick, simple text, with direct language and without flourishes, that is, the memo allows a language that goes straight to the main point of the message, without arrogance and subterfuge. Most of the time, the memo has professional and commercial objectives, which justifies the simplicity with which it is written.

A memo must have the following elements: Memo number, Sender; Recipient, Indication of the subject; Place and date; Message body, Signature and title.

3 0

2 years ago

Is a literary term different from a literary device ?

SpyIntel [72]

There is not discernible difference between them.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?

Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0

2 years ago

Please urgent please help

Svet_ta [14]

Tu him hitmrbab tuna uní

7 0

2 years ago