Answer:
True
Explanation:
The <u>statement is true</u> as we know according to CP-38 Commission Position toward Disclosure concerning Affiliated Business Arrangements as well as Conflicts, the comment additions Rule E-46 Affiliated Business Arrangements. §12-61-113.2, C.R.S. Affiliated Business Arrangements was established in Colorado to produce clarity, accountability, moreover customer protection during disclosure moreover regularity concerning affiliated marketing adjustments. Affiliated business organizations have also been organized for various years by the RESPA.
Answer:
$155.000
Explanation:
According with the information the person has first calculate the Equity. According with the accounting equation the Assets are equal to Liabilities plus the Equity. The first step is found the equity of the next way:
Equity year 1= Assets- Liabilities
Equity year 1= $210,000 - $85,000
Equity year 1= $125.000
Equity year 1= 125.000- 50.000 (dividends) = $75.000
Nevertheless, the calculation of the net income is measure independent of the operations in the balance sheet.
After you need to calculate the net income:
Net income= Revenues- Expenses
Net income= $275,000- $120,000
Net income= $155.000
As you can see the operations in the income statement only affects are affects by the revenue and the expenses.
Answer:
$20.00 and $32.50
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory using the lower of cost or market value which is shown below
For Product 1
Given that
Replacement Cost = $22.50
Net Realizable Value is
= Estimated selling price - Estimated cost to dispose
= $40 - $5
= $35
So, the market value is
= Net Realizable Value - Profit Margin
= $35 - (0.30 × $40)
= $23
As we can see that the cost is $20 and the market value is $23 so the lower value is $20 and the same should be selected
For Product 2
Given that
Replacement Cost = $27
Net Realizable Value is
= Estimated selling price - Estimated cost to dispose
= $65 - $13
= $52
So, the market value is
= Net Realizable Value - Profit Margin
= $52 - (0.30 × $65)
= $32.50
As we can see that the cost is $35 and the market value is $32.5 so the lower value is $32.5 and the same should be selected
This is an example of <u>Corner Solution.</u>
- A corner solution is a unique answer to the agent maximisation problem when one of the inputs in the maximised function has a quantity of zero. In layman's words, a corner solution occurs when the chooser is unable or unwilling to make a trade-off between several options.
<h3><u>In consumer theory, what do we mean by "corner solutions"?</u></h3>
- A corner solution is one in which none of the goods are present in the ideal bundle. 49 / 70. Consumer choice restrictions. The indifference curve is to the budget constraint at the best bundle if there is an inside solution.
To learn more about Corner Solutions, Click the links.
brainly.com/question/15186345
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Agriculture Department argues that the subsidy increases the "cost" of planting and that it will reduce supply and increase the price of competitively produced agricultural goods.
Explanation:
The department is correct with the agreement that subsidies increase the cost of planting, as the subsidy will decrease with the decrease in area planted and this will increase the output available.
As the subsidy is paid for un-planted area it will be increasing cost, and decreasing quantity of output.
This is clearly true, as they are directly related and this will increase the prices as supply will be low and high demand.
This need to be regulated properly, as no subsidy will discourage farmers, but high subsidies will also discourage farmers.
