Answer:$8,000
Step-by-step explanation:
YEah im too lazy to say hiow i sovled jt
Answer:
x > 9.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here it is just simplifying the inequality.
6 - 2/3x < x - 9
Add 2/3x to both sides.
6 < 5/3x - 9
Add 9 to both sides.
15 < 5/3x
Multiply by 3/5.
9 < x
Flip it.
x > 9.
Answer:
31
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
H0: μ = 5 versus Ha: μ < 5.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
μ = true average radioactivity level(picocuries per liter)
5 pCi/L = dividing line between safe and unsafe water
The recommended test here is to test the null hypothesis, H0: μ = 5 against the alternative hypothesis Ha: μ < 5.
A type I error, is an error where the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected when it is true.
We know type I error can be controlled, so safer option which is to test H0: μ = 5 vs Ha: μ < 5 is recommended.
Here, a type I error involves declaring the water is safe when it is not safe. A test which ensures that this error is highly unlikely is desirable because this is a very serious error. We prefer that the most serious error be a type I error because it can be explicitly controlled.
There should be 1,400 pages in an order that costs the same for both companies.
Let x be the unknown number of pages.
1st Company = 42 + 0.05x
2nd Company = 0.08x
0.08x = 42 + 0.05x
0.08x - 0.05x = 42
0.03x = 42
0.03x / 0.03 = 42 / 0.03
x = 1400 pages
To check
0.08x = 42 + 0.05x
0.08 (1400) = 42 + (0.05 * 1400)
112 = 42 + 70
112 = 112
