1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
3 years ago
14

Consider a hypothetical closed economy in which households spend $0.75 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remainin

g $0.25.
The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is ___(0.25 / 0.75 / 1 / 1.33 / 4)___ , and the spending multiplier for this economy is ____(0.25 / 0.75 / 1 / 1.33 / 4)____ .

Suppose the government in this economy decides to decrease government purchases by $250 billion. The decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income, generating an initial change in consumption equal to ____(-1,000billion / -500billion / -187.5billion / -93.8billion / -62.5billion)___ . This decreases income yet again, causing a second change in consumption equal to ___(-1000billion / -500billion / -93.8billion / -140.6billion / -62.5billion)____ . The total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending is .

Business
1 answer:
Nata [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer and Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-

1) Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is 0.75 as it denotes the spending of the household and saving of 0.25 and the spending multiplier for this economy is

= Spending Multiplier(M)

= 1 ÷ 1 - MPC

= 1 ÷ 1-0.75

= 1 ÷ 0.25

= 4

2). Decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income, generating an initial change in consumption

= -Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × MPC

= -$250 billion × 0.75

= -$187.5 billion

3). Decrease income again, causing a second change in consumption

= Amount Decrease in Government Purchases × MPC

= -$187.5 billion × 0.75

= $140.6 billion

4).Total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending

=  Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × Spending Multiplier(M)  

= $250 × 4

= $1,000 billion

= $1 trillion

As we can see that the income falls by $1000 billion in the end, so AD shifts to the left by the size of $1 trillion

In the question the graph is missing. Kindly find the attachment for both of question and answer

You might be interested in
Edelman Engines has $5 billion in total assets — of which cash and equivalents total $90 million. Its balance sheet shows $1 bil
masha68 [24]

Answer:

Edelman's market/book = 2.29

Edelman's EV/EBITDA = 10.52

Explanation:

Firstly, we need to calculate enterprise value (EV) & fiem value (FV) of Edelman Engines as below:

EV =  Market value of equity + Net market value of debt

     = Stock price x Number of share outstanding + (Debt - Cash)

     = 24 x 0.3 + (3.25 + 1 - 0.09) = 11.36

FV = Market value of equity + Market value of debt

     = Stock price x Number of share outstanding + Market value of debt

     = 24 x 0.3 + 3.25 + 1 = 11.45

Edelman's market/book = FV/Total asset = 11.45/5 = 2.29

Edelman's EV/EBITDA = 11.36/1.08 = 10.52

5 0
3 years ago
Identify the business manager who first "discovered" the beatles, changed their stage look from leather to matching suits, and s
Yuki888 [10]
SOUJI BOY BECUASE HE MALES MAGIC HAPPEN 


8 0
4 years ago
How do fast-food restaurants rationalize the process of providing food to customers, according to Robin Leidner in Fast Food, Fa
Nostrana [21]

According to <em>Robin Leidner</em>, fast-food restaurants rationalize the process of providing food to customers by developing standardized scripts for employees to use when dealing with customers.

There are many advantages associated with the fact that fast-food chains develop standardized scripts for customer service, as this way, they ensure compliance and quality of processes.

Standardization in fast-food restaurants therefore ensures faster service, mechanization of processes and higher quality in food production, since production and service standards must be followed in any unit of a fast-food chain.

Learn more about standardization here:

brainly.com/question/8189591

3 0
3 years ago
To compare two programs for training industrial workers to perform la skilled job, 10 workers are included in an experiment. All
Alex17521 [72]

If we compare the p value and the significance level assumed  we see that  so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude the the true mean for method 1 is lower than the mean for the method 2 at 5% of significance.

<h3>Data given and notation</h3>

We can calculate the sample mean and deviation with these formulas:

represent the mean for the sample mean for 1

represent the mean for the sample mean for 2

represent the sample standard deviation for the sample 1

represent the sample standard deviation for the sample 2

sample size selected 1

sample size selected 2

represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the average time taken when training under method 1 is less than the average time for Method 2, the system of hypothesis would be:

<h3>Null hypothesis:</h3>

Alternative hypothesis:

If we analyze the size for the samples both are less than 30 so for this case is better apply a t test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:

(1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other".

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

 P-value

The first step is calculate the degrees of freedom, on this case:

Since is a one sided test the p value would be:

To learn more about  null hypothesis visit the link

brainly.com/question/16261813

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
What are three common factors that make local economics different
Monica [59]

Local economics differ from national economics because locally different cities vary in population, the environment where they live and the location. Each of these factors change how items are produced and consumed and play into the national economic level. The population where you live helps determine the demand and supply of items in the area. The environment in which you live (natural disasters, resources, land type) determine the types of goods and services that are available and important in the area. The location in which you live helps determine the ease or difficulty of receiving items in the region you live in.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In marketing, advertisements or salespeople can activate a consumer's purchase decision process by _________.a. showing the shor
    8·2 answers
  • Allison has returned to school after five years out of the work force. She is taking one course at the local university for a co
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the theories of entrepreneurship​
    12·1 answer
  • A firm's good reputation for quality customer service is categorized as its _____
    6·1 answer
  • True or false: the lower the interest rate the lower the present balue of a set of mult
    15·1 answer
  • Economists sometimes give conflicting advice because
    9·1 answer
  • In early January, Burger Mania acquired 100% of the common stock of the Crispy Taco restaurant chain. The purchase price allocat
    7·1 answer
  • The u. s. government's immigration act of 1990:
    13·1 answer
  • When required, the information provided to the data subject in a HIPAA disclosure accounting …
    7·1 answer
  • Which student simplifies the expression correctly, and why?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!