Answer:
The answer is $1.55
Explanation:
From the question above, we have the following:
Money spent by customer = $65
Transaction fee = $0.25
Percentage charge = 2% of the total charge
We calculate the total transaction fee as follows:
2% of $65 will be = 0.02 X $65
=> $1.3
Recall that there is a transaction fee = $0.25.
Therefore, total transaction fee:
$1.3 + $0.25
=> $1.55
Answer:
The correct answer is c. Derived demand
.
Explanation:
Derived demand is the demand for goods and services that is generated as a result of the demand for other goods and services. This type of demand usually corresponds to the demand for factors or products, since the demand for a good or service may be related to the process necessary to produce another good or service, although it can affect both producers and consumers.
Derived demand can sometimes lead to an increase in the price of a marginal product, since the demand for the resources needed to produce a physical product also increases.
Answer:
Credit life Insurance
Explanation:
The scenario describes Credit life insurance
This is a form of insurance policy that that is designed to pay off the balance on a policy holder's outstanding loan in case of death. It is designed for the protection of lender and heirs who are co signers from loss in case of the death of the borrower.
The insurance is liable to the balance on the loan as at the time of the death of the borrower.
Answer:
Sequential interdependence on the line to pooled interdependence between the teams
Explanation:
Sequential interdependence occurs when a persons output is necessary for the performance of the next persons input. Perhaps the most obvious example of sequential interdependence is an assembly line.
While pooled interdependence he team accomplishes its tasks simply by bringing together everyone’s separate efforts. Like in DamierChrystern when the team work together to build the total car with the team deciding whi does what task. To be a team you need a team task — it requires that members actively work with each other to accomplish it
Answer:
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Explanation:
<u>For First stock </u>
Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64
HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%
Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%
<u>For Second stock </u>
Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68
Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:
Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%
Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
