<u>Answer:
</u>
The women that Helen Campbell interviewed in the 1880s preferred factory work over domestic service because the women sought good remuneration, respect, some time of leisure, and some other perks that they did not get by rendering domestic service.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The women who chose to involve themselves in domestic service were observed to be receiving the treatment that is usually given to maids.
- Moreover, they had to bear the mental and physical stress of managing the household and looking after the wellbeing of the entire family singlehandedly.
- Hence, women preferred factory work over domestic service so that they don't have to go through the things mentioned here and also receive the perks for being a factory worker.
Me queensmartel add me to the chat
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
Citizens were provoked by plans to cut public spending and raise taxes as austerity measures in exchange for a €110 billion bail-out, aimed at solving the Greek government-debt crisis at the time. So the correct answer is D.
Answer:
bECAUSE they are all different
Explanation:
