When your doing an interview never ask how much money do you make that will make them think that your there just for the money and not the job
The answer that I choose was false
Answer:
c. The maturity risk premium is assumed to be zero.
Explanation:
In the case when the term structure of the rate of interest would be measured via the pure expectations theory so here the maturity risk premium would be zero as under this theory it is assumed that the risk premium i.e. of the long term would be equivalent to the zero
Therefore the option c is correct
And, the rest of the options seems wrong
Answer:
D) Both the landowner and the attorney.
Explanation:
The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.
- When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
- The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.
