The correct answer is the agent and principal will be jointly and severally liable on the contract.
In general, an agent is not accountable for contracts made; the principal is. However, the agent will be held culpable if he is not or only partially revealed, if the agent lacks or exceeds authorization, or if the agent entered into the transaction in a personal role.
When an agent works on behalf of the principle in interactions with a third party, a contractual relationship is formed between the main and the third party, and the agent is not personally accountable.
Therefore, the correct option is the agent and principal will be jointly and severally liable on the contract.
To know more about principal agent liability click here:
brainly.com/question/13056777
#SPJ4
This scenario best illustrate Backward vertical integration
Explanation:
Backward integration is a vertical integration that extends the role of a organization to perform roles traditionally performed by firms in the supply chain.
In other terms, backward integration is where an enterprise imports another company providing the necessary goods or services for production.
For examples, an company might purchase the product or raw materials manufacturer. Businesses often complete retrograde incorporation of these other businesses or combine of them. However, they may set up their own divisions to perform this mission.
Go to the bathroom, get a glass of water and review you topics.
Answer:
Solution:
A.
p_x=3, G_x=\frac {100}{3}=33\frac{1}{3}p
x
=3,G
x
=
3
100
=33
3
1
p_y=5, G_y=\frac{100}{5}=20p
y
=5,G
y
=
5
100
=20
B.
100-0.25\times 100=75100−0.25×100=75
p_x=3, G_x=\frac {75}{3}=25p
x
=3,G
x
=
3
75
=25
p_y=5, G_y=\frac{75}{5}=15p
y
=5,G
y
=
5
75
=15
C.
p_x=6, G_x=\frac {100}{6}=16\frac{2}{3}p
x
=6,G
x
=
6
100
=16
3
2
D.
p_y=5, G_y=\frac{100}{4}=25p
y
=5,G
y
=
4
100
=25
2.
MU_x=68-60=8, p_x=2MU
x
=68−60=8,p
x
=2
MU_y=29-25=4, p_y-?MU
y
=29−25=4,p
y
−?
\frac {MU_x}{p_x}=\frac{MU_y}{p_y}
p
x
MU
x
=
p
y
MU
y
\frac{8}{2}=\frac {4}{p_y}
2
8
=
p
y
4
p_y=1p
y
=1
Answer:
b. A deduction from net income in determining cash flows from operating activities.
Explanation:
An increase in prepaid expenses is deducted from Net Income. The reason behind it very simple and no rocket science is there. Lets take Insurance as a prepaid expense. You Paid in-advance for Insurance, it increase your current asset that is Prepaid Insurance BUT at the same time cash went out of the Business.
I hope I made it clear to you. If you still have any queries, feel free to ask me.
Thanks!
