1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
3 years ago
6

2. Write a paragraph describing the allied strategy used in the Pacific.

History
1 answer:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The truism surrounding the Pearl Harbor tragedy is that the US was provided with the destruction of the battleship fleet. Navy with a wake-up call putting it on the Pacific path to victory. Like all such popular beliefs, there is a grain of truth in it, but there is also considerable misunderstanding of the hard processes that the U.S. military, and especially the navy, had to go through before they were fully prepared to fight and prepared to deal with the Imperial Japanese Navy on a relatively equal basis. Pearl Harbor was, in fact, just the opening round of a series of crises that molded and influenced both American strategy and conflict itself. It is then the intention of this paper to investigate American naval and military strategy during the first ten months of the war and gain insight into what actually happened and how the services, particularly the navy, were transformed from a peacetime force with a peacetime bureaucratic culture into the amazing instrument they were to become by the summer of 1943. The crucial point on which this paper will focus will be the reciprocal strategic influence and operations on American strategic leadership at the sharp end of the fight against Japanese forces during the first 11 months of the Pacific War – a period that laid the foundation for the eventual American triumphs of 1943 and 1944.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I do need help with this:
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

Both of the Empires has the same form of government, Authoritorian,also both were ruled by hereditary rulers.

5 0
2 years ago
HEY GUYS CAN YOU GUYS WRITE EVERYTHING YOU KNOW FROM THIS INFORMATION PLUS EVERYTHING YOU THINK THESE ARTIFACTS MEAN ABOUT THE C
beks73 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The first one possibly represnts someone. Maybe someone important. A ruler, a well known person. A leader. It could also just be art that was made representing no person in particular. It can also be a toy. For kids to play with.

The second one looks a bit like the Nebuchadnezzar Chronicle. So maybe it's something similar.  The artifact looks like it has writing on it so it may have some record, or a story on it.

I honestly have never seen these before.

Don't think this will help but I hope it does. :)

7 0
3 years ago
Which group feared that freed slaves would take its jobs at lower wages? 1) Abolitionist. 2) Northern laborers. 3) Union soldier
Helen [10]
That slaves would take its jobs at lower wages is people in border states.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many years are between 100 bce & 100 ce? please provide an explanation too
aev [14]

Answer:

199 years

Explanation:

The BCE is known as Before the Common Era, while CE means Common Era. And because the year is counted downwards, 100 BCE to CE is expected to be 100 years. However, because there is no 0 CE, hence that would be 99 years.

Also, adding the next 100 CE years, that will make the total sum of 199 years.

In other words, The calculation is 100 BCE + 100 CE, which equals 200 years. However, there is a need to adjust for the absence of year 0. This is done by subtracting 1 from the answer, hence, 200 minus 1 is 199.

5 0
3 years ago
100 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
harina [27]

Answer:

see below the con and pros

Explanation:

pros

in the modern-day city of Istanbul which was Constantinople, now its Istanbul, not Constantinople.  Which provided the inspiration for a song made famous by They Might Be Giants.

cons

the fall of Byzantine empire, the question of what life would be like, if it hadn’t, will never be answered.  Sure, there might be some alternate reality where the Byzantines are alive and well.  Aspects of string theory certainly suggest so.  But who knows what the modern political landscape might look like with the formal existence of the Byzantine?

pros

The fall of the Byzantine empire is part of the history of the world, as we know it.   We might wear hats on our feet for all we know.   What might the world look like if the empire had not fallen?

cons

Fall of the Byzantine empire led to an abundance of knowledge that is lost forever, think about that forever.  The loss of “Greek Fire” is definitely a drag.  Greek Fire was an incendiary weapon used by the Byzantine navy, and could burn on water. No one knows just what went into that technological advantage possessed by the Byzantines.  

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is true about the actions of Muhammad and his followers?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the term for a group of people with no permanent place of settlement
    5·1 answer
  • Was the atlantic charter of 1941 similar to woodrow wilson's 14 points?
    13·1 answer
  • Can you name a state where women can vote before 1920
    12·2 answers
  • What measures did the Radical Republicans take to reshape Southern Society during the Radical Reconstruction?
    14·1 answer
  • Japan was more accepting of Western advances than China in the nineteenth century because
    12·1 answer
  • What is the mission of the U.N
    9·1 answer
  • PLS AWNSER ASAP 20 PTS
    8·1 answer
  • Which event caused an American declaration of war against Spain?
    7·1 answer
  • Who is the first person who travel around the world?​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!