Answer:Quebec City
Explanation:The Battle of Quebec was fought on December 31, 1775, between American Continental Army forces and the British defenders of Quebec City early in the American Revolutionary War.
Answer:
b. created an international diplomatic crisis for Abraham Lincoln.
Explanation:
The Trent Affair was a diplomatic incident in 1861 during the American Civil War that threatened a war between the United States and the United Kingdom.
The crisis erupted after the captain of the U.S. San Jacinto ordered the arrest of two Confederate envoys sailing to Europe aboard a British mail ship, the Trent, in order to seek support for the South in the Civil War. The British, who had not taken sides in the war, were outraged and claimed the seizure of a neutral ship by the U.S. Navy was a violation of international law. In the end, President Abraham Lincoln’s administration released the envoys and averted an armed conflict with Britain.
C. Equally to everyone.
Laws go for everyone no matter what.
I hope that helps! If u want more info lmk :)
The creation of interchangeable parts greatly changes the labor force during the 1800's. Interchangeable parts allows for a standard size of goods (clothes, furniture, etc.). Due to this change, the workforce transformed from a demand for skilled workers to unskilled workers. With interchangeable parts, there was no longer a need for individuals to make everything from hand. Instead, businesses were able to mass produce products with the help of unskilled workers. These workers were usually taught a specific, repeatable task. As long as the unskilled worker was able to learn this task, they would be able to keep their job. This revolutionizes the workforce for over 100 years, as the addition of the assembly line along with interchangeable parts results in the creation of products at a rate never seen before in world history.
Answer:
We are great at filtering sounds!
Explanation:
During the first stage of the experiment known by psychologists as the cocktail party effect, Edward Cherry he could determine:
- Listeners got really confused and were unable to separate conversations when listening simultaneously at both ears at the same time.
Later, when messages were played each on one ear only, participants could differentiate 1 conversation clearly and easily, but ignored completely the other one. Here he could determine:
- Listeners couldn't identify language, phrases, backwards playing and even their own name on the rejected conversation.
