1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
2 years ago
5

Case 4.3, Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., involved a Mariners fan, Delinda Middleton Taylor, who was injured by a base

ball that entered the stands during team warm-ups. The issue in the case was a. whether the risk of injury from an errant baseball was foreseeable to a reasonable person with Taylor's familiarity with baseball. b. whether the ball was thrown into the stands intentionally. c. whether Taylor suffered a legally recognizable injury. d. false imprisonment.
Law
1 answer:
Doss [256]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.

You might be interested in
____is the drug administration method with the highest risk of causing collapse veins.
Leona [35]

Answer:

injection

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
La medida en que la organización pone el énfasis en la burocracia, versus el énfasis puesto en un ambiente de trabajo libre, inf
Gwar [14]

do u speak English bnkhhhdgnn

5 0
3 years ago
Through a series of compromises the delegates were able to agree on the important points of the new plan. After its approval by
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation did not solve some of the problems that the republic was going through and that was why it was necessary to create the federal constitution, which created and gave power to a unified government and which managed to suppress the problems and challenges that the country presented. However, the constitution had to be approved by the delegates of each state and not everyone was willing to approve it. A group of delegates called anti-federalists, believed that the constitution gave the president too much power and that was dangerous.

To have the support of anti-federalists, the federalists agreed to add a bill of rights to the new document, which ended up working.

3 0
3 years ago
What are the pros and cons of being a police detective?
Jobisdone [24]
Well payed , difficult , dangerous
3 0
3 years ago
Having supreme power within its own
sergey [27]

Answer:

Having supreme power within its own territory; neither subordinate 11or responsible to any other authority. Add answer. Log in to add comment.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 18. If your car is stalled on a railroad track and no train is visible in any direction, you should:
    11·2 answers
  • 4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
    7·1 answer
  • In a criminal case, the ______ plays the role of a plaintiff.
    5·1 answer
  • True or false?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is the Fifth Amendment important in preserving a citizen’s right to protect oneself?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is local government so important?
    15·2 answers
  • Why does soft money tend to exert more influence in elections than hard money? a.Soft money can only be used for ads that are no
    6·1 answer
  • The due process model is concerned with doing what for individuals?
    5·1 answer
  • If you get more than 18 points on your licenses within 18 months, you will lose your license for 90 days
    7·2 answers
  • A enters into a civil marriage with B. B has a sister, C. A and C are
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!