Answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall
Answer:
A. House of Representatives
C. Senate
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States of America can be amended because the Founding Fathers believed that there might be reason to in order to ensure that the rights and welfare of all Americans are looked after.
Recognizing the impact a Constitutional amendment could make however, they made the process a bit difficult to ensure that the amendment has enough support.
There are two ways to propose an amendment. The first is through Congress where two-thirds of both Houses of Congress would have to vote in favor of the amendment for it to proceed.
The Second is when two-thirds of States ask Congress to form a National Convention which will then Nominate Amendments.
In the first method, the process of Amendment can begin either in the Senate or the House of Representatives because it will still need a two-thirds vote in either.
Answer:
its A
Explanation:
(A) Describe the role conception in which the representative is most likely to engage.
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
