Answer: D. All of the above
Explanation: The three options listed could explain why the productivity of labor increased with a reduction in the quantity of labor hired. The law of diminishing returns states that as more and more inputs of production are added, a time comes in when additional inputs causes no corresponding increase in productivity. At points like this a reduction in the input added would restore productivity.
Reducing the amount of labor obviously is a labour saving technical change. Changes in organizational innovation can also result in changes in productivity.
Answer:
the material quantity variance is $1,350 unfavorable
Explanation:
The computation of the material quantity variance is given below:
Materials quantity variance is
= (Actual quantity × Standard price) - (Standard quantity × Standard price)
= (21,200 × $1.50) - [(2,900 × 7) × 1.5]
= $31,800 - $30,450
= $1,350 Unfavourable
Hence, the material quantity variance is $1,350 unfavorable
Answer:
$23,950
Explanation:
Income $100,000
Expenses $75,000
Depreciation $22,000
income tax rate = 35%
Income $100,000
Expenses ($75,000)
Depreciation ($22,000)
EBT $3,000
Income Tax $3,000 * (35/100) = $1,050
Net Income $1,950
ATCF
=Earnings Before Tax + Depreciation
=$1,950 + $22,000 = $23,950
Answer:
you have to ask a question if you don't see what you need
Explanation:
<h2>Q1. The company's conformance with standards</h2><h2>Q2. It is illegal for an employer to continue to hire new employees while laying off other employees.</h2>
Explanation:
Question 1:
Ability to meet designed specification is called conformance. So since the HR manager wants to check if the organization is managing its bottom line, it is better to measure whether the contributions meet the expectations.
Question 2:
When the turnover is not up to the mark, then it is not recommended to hire a new one and send off the existing employee. We can increase turn over only with the existing set and on need the company can hire new people.
