1) ‘I’ll make a fine Nation of you, or I’ll die in the making!’
2) “I’ve come back,” he repeated; “and I was the King—me and Dravot—crowned Kings we was!
3) “I am telling you as straight as I can, but my head isn’t as good as it might be.
Explanation:
The first one is about his plans on becoming the new king, and to do that, he won't let anything get on his path to rule the whole kingdom, and if it does, he's capable of dying to get there.
The second one is an illusion, something that was happening only on his mind after drinking too much, but he realizes it after that.
The last one is a suffering, he is suffering for a specific reason that is pretty much influencing him to feel sad at the moment.
Answer: emphasize that statewide changes depend on individual choices
Explanation: Writers frequently use subordination to signal an imbalance or inequality between ideas. In the sentence toward the middle of the final paragraph, the author uses the subordinate clause “if Wyoming is going to be a more diverse place” to identify a situation that could exist in the future. She then uses an independent clause to reveal the condition that must be met for this situation to exist—“people have to choose to live” there. By organizing the sentence this way, the author places an emphasis on what individuals must do in order to change the state of Wyoming as a whole.
Scraping your nails on the chalk board electrocutes your brain.
tbh im not sure if this is right and I'm sorry if it is wrong
