Yes because if you take 4:3 it equals out to be 2:1.5
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
C
A line with undefined slope is a vertical line parallel to the y-axis, passing through all points with the same x-coordinate.
For this reason it's equation is x = c
where c is the value of the x-coordinate the line passes through
For (- 3, 5 ) the x-coordinate is - 3, hence
x = - 3 → is the equation of the line
So @mathmate deleted my comment because "I wasn't explaining my answer" well I did
I clearly stated that you have to make educated guess and I showed how I GOT my answer
so i guess here is my "proper" answer
There is no specific formula for this, so you can make an educated guess
for example:
13*5 = 65 (this isn't right because we need a minimum of 114)
so we continue the guessing
I then next tried
13*9
I got 117,
117 is more than 113
making 9 the minimum amount of rows for the hotel parking lot
there ya go @mathmate is that clear enough?
