All categories

2 years ago

The race to the bottom scenario of global environmental degradation is explained roughly like this:

Business

2 answers:

DIA [1.3K]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.

D. self-sufficiency argument.

Explanation:

In the case when there is a race to the bottom scenario so it would be described that the multinational companies that are profit seeking is shifting their production from that countries who have the strong environmental standards to the weak standard countries so that the order would be decreased due to this the profit would increase

In the other case, when the nation is not too much depend on other countries for supplies so this case we called as self-sufficiency argument as they managed themselves rather depending on another

Katen [24]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

1. A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.

2. D. self-sufficiency argument.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

You might be interested in

The rental real estate exception favors: A. lower-income taxpayers (AGI less than $80,000). B. middle-income taxpayers (AGI grea

Andru [333]

Answer:

D) lower-income taxpayers and middle-income taxpayers.

Explanation:

The rental real estate exemption allows taxpayers who are not real estate professionals, to deduct up to $25,000 of real estate loss per year.

This exemption applies for taxpayers with an adjusted gross income of $150,000 or less. Only those that have an AGI of less than $100,000 are able to deduct the full $25,000 exemption, but as their AGI increase, the exemption starts to phase out.

The two basic requirements for qualifying for this exemption is that the individual actively participates in the management of the real estate property that generated the loss and that they own at least a 10% interest in the property.

4 0

3 years ago

while the washington family was gone for the weekend, their home was broken into and robbed. manny, a professional boxer who liv

Kisachek [45]

Manny's acts would be a past factor in any lawsuit he filed against Mr. Washington, so Manny would lose. Filipino boxer Manny Pacquiao competed as a professional from 1995 until 2021. regarded as one of the greatest professional boxers ever by boxing historians...

<h3>Where does Manny stand historically?</h3>

On ESPN's list of the top boxers, pound-for-pound, over the past 25 years, Pacquiao was placed second in 2016. Pacquiao is ranked by BoxRec as the third-best boxer of all time, pound for pound, and as the best Asian boxer ever.
A boxer who has won major world championships in eight different weight divisions is known as an octuple champion. The only boxer in history, Manny Pacquiao, has won twelve major world championships in just eight years.

To learn more about Manny pacquiao refer to:

brainly.com/question/28774013

#SPJ4

3 0

8 months ago

Recall the text’s definition of diminishing marginal utility: "the common pattern that each marginal unit of a good consumed pro

son4ous [18]

<u>Explanation:</u>

Note, the term diminishing marginal utility refers to an economic principle that states that the more unit of a particular commodity or service we consume, the more the satisfaction (utility) derived out of the consumption reduces or diminishes.

For instance, if I watched movies produced by a particular entertainment company for several days (eg Disney Studios), I may become dissatisfied using this particular entertainment provider and may decide to try another service (Netflix).

Another instance could occur after exercising, I'm given 3 bottles of coke, after taking my first bottle, the amount of utility I derive would reduce until I get to the third bottle, at this point I've reached my peak.

The law of diminishing marginal utility failed for someone I know who had used the same type of toothpaste and brushed her teeth at least once a day for a period of over 10 years.

6 0

2 years ago

Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? Write at least three paragraphs discussing your position.

Andrews [41]

(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw. Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.

7 0

3 years ago

Jim operates his business on the accrual method and this year he received $4,000 for services that he intends to provide to his

Ainat [17]

Answer:

He can choose to defer the recognition of the income until next year, only if the income is not recognized for financial accounting purposes.

7 0

3 years ago