Answer: I'm pretty sure it is the Puritans. Only because religion wasn't one of the major causes for the American Revolution.
The answer is B, because the seventh man found peace when he returned to his hometown.
Answer:
In the first place, <u>to create its ultramarine Empire just like Spain and Portugal. </u>And second, <u>because England was late on this process </u>because of the political problems and the constant wars which were involved. But the colonization process of what later became known as the Thirteen Colonies was different from Spain or Portugal because <u>the puritans were going there to settle, and these colonies were created under moral, philosophical and religious rules, which motivated different behaviors related to trade and market.</u>
Explanation:
The religious persecution of Puritans, the English Calvinists, especially after the creation of Anglicanism with Henry VIII, led them to move to America. The objective was to create living spaces where they could freely exercise their religious precepts. In addition to the political and religious disputes, which in different periods took Anglicans and Puritans to America, there was also the expulsion of a large part of the peasant population from the fields, mainly with the Fences. This process of land encircling by large landowners generated an urban population swelling, contributing for part of the population to emigrate to North America. All these aspects lead to creating colonies strictly based on the settlement, different from the Iberian colonization that was based on exploration.
Laissez-Faire economics is when the government doesn't get involved in the economic affairs of a nation.
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
