Yes, Rubio will be able to successfully sue and collect the $1,000 later because their agreement was not fulfilled.
<h3>What is an agreement in contract?</h3>
In contract, an agreement is an element of what makes a contract valid. When an agreement is breached, then, the aggrieved party have a right to void the contract.
In conclusion, the answer is yes because Rubio will be able to successfully sue and collect the $1,000 later because their agreement was not fulfilled.
Read more about agreement
<em>brainly.com/question/997952</em>
Local
Shhsbsn( I needed 20 chacters)
Answer:
$101,904.6
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods sold using the average cost method is shown below:
Beginnig Inventory 285 at $157 = $44,745
Purchases 485 at $177 = $85,845
Purchases 185 at $217 = $40,145
Total cost = $170,735
Now
Total number of units is
= 285 + 485 + 185
= 955
Now
Average Cost per unit is
= $170,735 ÷ 955
=$ 178.78
And, finally
Cost of goods Sold is
= 570 × $178.78
= $101,904.6
Answer:
The answer is option C) Yes No
Explanation:
Current liabilities are obligations that are reasonably expected to be paid from Existing Creation of Other Current Assets and not current liabilities.
This is because, Current liabilities are short term liabilities due within a year. They include accounts payable, short term debt and overdraft. This means that payment can only be generated by current assets.
Current assets are also short term assets with a life span of on year. They include accounts receivable an cash.
Therefore, Yes, Current liabilities are obligations that are reasonably expected to be paid from Existing Creation of Other Current Assets.
And No, Current liabilities are obligations that are not expected to be paid from Existing Creation of Other Current Liabilities.
