Answer:
3. Supply of flour to increase.
Explanation:
The situation above is showing a<em> direct proportional relationship</em> between the "wheat," as a main ingredient of flour, and the flour itself.
If the price of wheat <em>decreases</em>, <u>suppliers will be interested in buying more of it in order to produce more quantities of flour at a </u><em><u>lower cost </u></em>because it will more likely lead to a<em><u> higher profit</u></em>. This will, therefore, increase the supply of flour in the market.
Answer:
$450,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Direct Labor = $200,000;
Direct Materials = $150,000;
Manufacturing Overhead Costs = $250,000
Therefore, the total amount of conversion cost is the sum total of direct labor cost and manufacturing overhead cost.
Total amount of BG, Inc's conversion costs:
= Direct Labor cost + Manufacturing Overhead Costs
= $200,000 + $250,000
= $450,000
Answer:
(A) Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
Explanation:
Shawn renounce to less goods than Sue when producing donuts.
This meas, Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts as their cost from the economic point of view are lower.
This do not imply that Sue cannot outproduce Shawn, it means it cost her more than Shawn
For example, if Sue produce 10 Donuts, but to produce donuts resing to produce 20 of other goods, each donut has an opportunity cost of 2
While Shawn can produce 8 donuts and resing to produce 8 of other goods:
each donut has an opportunity cost of 1
Therefore, is better for the overall economy to Shawn produce donuts and trade with Sue for the other good.
Answer:
A. He has made several significant contributions to the areas of organizational learning and change.
Explanation:
<em>Option B</em>: Peter Drucker was the first person to discuss MBO, not Peter Senge. So, this option is incorrect.
<em>Option C</em>: It is the function of management. Therefore, Peter Senge might contribute to this one, but there is no evidence. So, it is wrong.
<em>Option D</em>: Peter Senge advocated the scientific methods of management, but not for the determination of efficient production.
<em>Option E</em>: He does not contend with the bureaucratic structure. Therefore, it is wrong, either.
<em>Option A</em>: It is the answer because he has made several contributions to the areas of organizational learning through the establishment of the society of organizational learning.
Answer: Payment for Knowledge
Explanation:Training is a key aspect for a company's improvement development and success. It is beneficial to both employers and employees of an organization. An employee will become more efficient and productive if he is trained well.
Due to the continuous updates and improvement in the world technology relating to businesses, Most Organisations are willing to pay for training thier employees off the job so to cope up with those changes, improve the working conditions, and enhance their knowledge.
Even though such training are costly,on the long run, they improve efficiency and productivity of employees. Well trained employees show both quantity and quality performance leading to optimal use of time, money and resources.
The company seeking for Zach to learn to manage multiple departments, and proferring to pay his tuition while he earns an mba at stanford university and give him a $20,000-a-year raise once he gets his degree shows that the company is willing to pay for more knowledge as that hopefully will go a long way to improve their productivity when he returns.
