The correct answer is Ravenna.
That is because Ravenna was a city that was reconquered by the Byzantine empire after it originally fell to the Ostrogoth when the fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred. It was a capital for western Romans and for the Ostrogoth, but it wasn't for the Byzantine people who had their own capitol even after they reconquered it.
I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.
<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>
Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.
C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.
D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.
Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D
Answer:
if your talking about BCE then it would be the indians trading with other colonies.
Explanation:
Evidence #1 first example/ piece of evidence that's supports your claim
evidence#2 ^ same as number 1
evidence#3^same as #1
and then the summary/ conclusion sentences
in a sentence or two restate your claim / argument
