Answer:
cost of goods available for sales= $3,180
Number of units= 50 units
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Wattan Company reports beginning inventory of 10 units at $60 each. Every week for four weeks it purchases an additional 10 units at respective costs of $61, $62, $65, and $70 per unit for weeks 1 through 4.
To calculate the cost of goods available for sales, we need to use the following formula:
cost of goods available for sales= beginning inventory + cost of goods purchase during the year
cost of goods available for sales= 10*60 + 10*61 + 10*62 + 10*65 + 10*70
cost of goods available for sales= $3,180
Number of units= 5*10= 50 units
Answer:
To reduce the chance of fraud.
Explanation:
An appropriate practice to reduce transaction fraud would be "traceability," which is the ability to track and follow the supply chain of some manipulation. This greatly helps prevent fraud and loss of information.
Financial frauds are actions that a person performs in order to obtain a profit of their own at the cost of damage the economy of another.
Answer and Explanation:
Earnings per Share, EPS = <u>Net Income dividend of preferred stock</u>
Number of stock outstanding
EPS depends on the earnings and its dilution due to increase in preferred stock also it depends on the net income earned
When EPS is higher than analyst prediction,
this may be due to increase in the net income
or
payback of common stock or preferred stock
thereby leading to reduction in the number of stock outstanding
When EPS is lower than analyst prediction
this would be due to reduction in the net income
or
increase of stock or preferred stock due to fresh issue
Insurance against issues that could lead to reduction on income and inrease in the activities that will lead to net income increase can help meet or surpass analyst prediction
a toothpaste with a whitening agent and cavity fighting protection
Answer:
Incorrect
Explanation:
The Bard company has paid millions of dollar of consideration and requires that the Philip Conway Inc. would transfer the ownership of the RM Corporation to Bard. The court dismissed the case and said that the subsidiary is the property of Bard now because their was a flow of consideration from the part of Bard.
