Answer: Contingency planning
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the planning for an upcoming event that may or may not occur in the future. This planning is usually done by organisation so that they can act accordingly if any problem in business operations occurs in future.
In the given case, even after having positive forecast, Donna is planning for future uncertainty such as unexpected stoppage on sales.
Thus we can conclude that this is the type of contingency planning.
Answer:
(a) Earnings per share = Net income ÷ Number of shares
= $22,500,000 ÷ 6,500,000
= $3.46
Price-earnings ratio = Stock price ÷ Earnings per share
= $72 ÷ $3.46
= 20.81
(b) Earnings per share = Net income ÷ Number of shares
= $22,500,000 ÷ (6,500,000 + 650,000)
= $3.15
R = (M0 - S) ÷ (N + 1)
= ($72 - $66.50) ÷ (7 + 1)
= $0.69
where,
M0 = current market price of Walker common stock
S = selling price per share
N = seven rights is needed to buy one of the new shares
Ex-rights price = Rights-on price - Rights value
= $72 - $0.69
= $71.31
Price-earnings ratio = Stock price ÷ Earnings per share
= $71.31 ÷ $3.15
= 22.64
No, Dr G has nothing to worry about because only 8 students won the academic as well as fine arts award out of 128 academic award winners. This corresponds to very low percentage of joint winners out of just academic award winners (0.0625%)
Explanation:
Total students in the Westside High School- 768
Winner of academic awards- 128
Winner of fine arts awards- 48
Students who won both awards- 8
Dr G pre assumption= Dr G was worried that winner of academic awards would win fine awards more likely.
But it seems that his assumtions are wrong since only 8 students out of 128 students won joint awards (meaning only 8 students won awards for fine arts as well as academic awards). Similarly, this corresponds to only 0.0625% of students winning academic awards as well as Fine arts awards.
Answer:
Part a: According to Solow model higher per capita real GDP will be in Chile because of its highest saving rate.
Part b: The per capita capital stock or the labour ratio is the primary factor for these differences in the simple Solow model.
Explanation:
<em>Part a:</em>
According to Solow model higher per capita real GDP will be in Chile because of its highest saving rate.
In Solow model the GDP per capita is defined as
Also the steady state path is given as
As all other parameters are same thus the country with higher value of s will have a higher per capita GDP.
According to the Solow model, higher saving rate means larger capital stock and high level of output at the steady state.
Higher saving rate leads to faster growth in Solow model. So there is higher per capita real GDP for the country that has higher saving rate.
<em>Part b:</em>
In Simple Solow Model, the steady state per Capita GDP, 
is the function of the steady state per capita capital stock given as 
Now this indicates that
where f is an increasing concave function i.e. f'>0 and f''<0
Thus the sole dependence of per capita GDP is on per capita capital stock.
Thus the per capita capital stock or the labour ratio is the primary factor for these differences in the simple Solow model.
Answer : The markup rate based on cost is 91.79747%.
We have
Selling price per jacket = $37.88
Cost per jacket = $19.75
![Markup rate =[\frac{Selling Price - Cost}{Cost}] * 100](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Markup%20rate%20%3D%5B%5Cfrac%7BSelling%20Price%20-%20Cost%7D%7BCost%7D%5D%20%2A%20100%20)
Substituting the values in the formula above we get,
![Markup rate = [\frac{37.88-19.75}{19.75}] *100](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Markup%20rate%20%3D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B37.88-19.75%7D%7B19.75%7D%5D%20%2A100%20)
![Markup rate = [\frac{18.13}{19.75}] *100](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Markup%20rate%20%3D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B18.13%7D%7B19.75%7D%5D%20%2A100%20)
%
