The correct answer is <span>what is written in the Constitution is not open to interpretation
Strict constructionism is a way of interpreting the constitution. Constructionists only accept what is written and the way in which it was written. There is nothing beyond what is written and from his point of view, if it says that all people are equal and citizens of the United States then all people indeed, including African-Americans. For him, there is no interpretation that looks at deeper meaning, what is written is what is intended and that's why he is a strict constructionist. </span>
Either punctuation or short phrases
To restate the central point of the argument and make a final bid for the audience's support.
That was the answer for Apex, if you're not using this for apex, I still hope I helped somewhat.
I think it might be: Hilda Annersley, Headmistress by Lesley Green
When a coordinating conjunction connects two independent clauses, it is often (but not always) accompanied by a comma;
The comma is always correct when used to separate two independent clauses connected by a coordinating conjunction. Mark for brainliest answer
