<span>All of its potentially negative effects are not certain yet.
Hope this answers your question. have a nice day!</span>
The answer is <u>"A. Biological augmentation".</u>
Biological augmentation is the expansion of archaea or bacterial societies required to accelerate the rate of degradation of a contaminant. Organisms that begin from polluted territories may as of now have the capacity to separate waste, however maybe wastefully and gradually.
Bioaugmentation more often than not requires examining the indigenous assortments present in the area to decide whether biostimulation is conceivable. On the off chance that the indigenous assortment don't have the metabolic ability to play out the remediation procedure, exogenous assortments with such complex pathways are presented.
Answer:
1. I can’t think of the percentage off the top of my head, but I have the rest of the answers:
2. By cutting down trees, you are releasing the carbon dioxide that the trees were previously storing, and deforestation also limits the amount of trees available to take part in photosynthesis.
3. In order to have agriculture, you must have land to grow the food on; in order to get this land, some people need to burn jungles and rainforests for more space (what‘s currently happening in the Amazon).
4. Set incentives for the government. This encourages them to not chop down trees, as there will be a visible benefit.
5. I would say education. It’s difficult in less developed countries, because it truly is all that they rely on; but through education, people can at least be aware of what they are doing so when the time comes they will be able to stop it.
Explanation:
Answer:
7gg chcuvuvuycycyctcyv
Explanation:
cig ugcf7xf7xfx7xf7xf7 f7xuf f7xf7
