The "Speaker of the House" is the leader of the "<span>majority political party and sets the agenda for legislative work"
In short, Your Answer would be Option B
Hope this helps!</span>
1. The biography and the autobiography have lot of things in common, but they also have few differences. The biggest and most important difference between the two is that the biography is written for someone by someone else, while the autobiography is written by person himself/herself it is about. This leads us to say that the biography is taking away the personal opinion and person expressions of the person whose life is described, as it only offers the perspective from the other people, or a single person.
2. The biography and the autobiography are of great help for the historians. The biography offers the view of a particular person for the person in question, be it the action that person has done, the physical appearance, the character etc. The autobiography, on the other hand, gives clues about how the person in question has viewed himself/herself, and how that person was seeing the world and their own actions and behavior. Both combined, give a nice perspective from two sides, which gives clues about the real historical events.
Answer:
Also called the Great American Desert, the Great Plains lie between the Rio Grande in the south and the delta of the Mackenzie River at the Arctic Ocean in the north and between the Interior Lowlands and the Canadian Shield on the east and the Rocky Mountains on the west.
Explanation:
points
I think, maybe. Because,
Long before the Roman Republic was established in 509 BCE, the early Romans lived by laws developed through centuries of custom. This customary law (ius, in Latin) was handed down through generations and was considered by the Romans to be an inherited aspect of their society as it had evolved from its earliest days. Integral to the notion that this customary law was part of the fabric of early Roman culture was the fact that this law only applied to Roman citizens and was thus ius civile, or civil law.
The citizens of Rome were divided into two classes: patricians, the elite class who ruled Roman society, and plebeians, the common people. One element of the patricians' elite status was that a group of patrician men called pontiffs were the ones who made decisions and ruled in questions of customary law. Over time, plebeians came to see that because of the disparity between their positions, patricians tended to have some advantage in the legal decisions made by the pontiffs who were their equals in status and power, and dissatisfaction grew with what many perceived to be the arbitrariness of the decisions made.
